1996
DOI: 10.1159/000106882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of Multivariate Methods in the Identification of Subtypes of Alzheimer's Disease: A Comparison of Principal Components and Cluster Analysis

Abstract: Two contrasting multivariate statistical methods, viz., principal components analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis were applied to the study of neuropathological variations between cases of Alzheimer''s disease (AD). To compare the two methods, 78 cases of AD were analysed, each characterised by measurements of 47 neuropathological variables. Both methods of analysis revealed significant variations between AD cases. These variations were related primarily to differences in the distribution and abundance of senil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our review shows that both hypothesis-driven and datadriven methods have been used for determining biological subtypes of AD. A number of early studies [6][7][8] used principal component analysis and other clustering methods on pathologic measures of senile plaques, neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs), and cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA). Later studies mainly focused on markers of tau pathology and neurodegeneration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our review shows that both hypothesis-driven and datadriven methods have been used for determining biological subtypes of AD. A number of early studies [6][7][8] used principal component analysis and other clustering methods on pathologic measures of senile plaques, neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs), and cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA). Later studies mainly focused on markers of tau pathology and neurodegeneration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cluster analysis has been used to profile and classify systems or taxonomies (Leonard & Droege, 2008;Sokal & Rohlf, 1962), and whilst it has consistently been applied in other disciplines, such as nanotechnology and cell biology (Armstrong et al, 1996;Johnson, 1997;Schweitzer & Renehan, 1997;Semmar et al, 2005;Winterstein et al, 2004), it has only recently been used successfully to investigate human movement characteristics (Clark, Barnes, Holton, et al, 2016b).…”
Section: Cluster Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous researchers classified subtypes of AD using various methods such as clinical subtypes defined by diagnostic criteria [1][2][3][4][5]; atrophy subtypes assessed using magnetic resonance imaging [6][7][8][9][10][11]; etiological subtypes or molecular subtypes characterized by pathological levels of cerebrospinal fluid A␤ 1-42 , total tau, and phosphorylated tau [12,13]; and subtypes based on statistical analyses, such as latent class analysis of Mini-Mental Examination (MMSE) scores [14] and principal component analysis and cluster analysis of the distribution and abundance of senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles in the brain [15,16]. Staging using assessment scales is another method of understanding AD pathology [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%