1992
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1992.10476278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of Names for Linking Personal Records

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A signiÿcant advantage of the probabilistic strategy is the ability to use value-speciÿc estimates of probabilities (see Newcombe et al [36] and Winkler [25]) for the m( ) and u( ) probabilities to improve the linkage. Thus, for example, agreement on rare values of the jth identifying variable would be given higher values for m( j ) than agreement on common values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A signiÿcant advantage of the probabilistic strategy is the ability to use value-speciÿc estimates of probabilities (see Newcombe et al [36] and Winkler [25]) for the m( ) and u( ) probabilities to improve the linkage. Thus, for example, agreement on rare values of the jth identifying variable would be given higher values for m( j ) than agreement on common values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3032 Searches were also made through the United States and the United Kingdom as needed. As of the common closing date of December 31, 1992, death information was complete for the 1952 sample but vital status remained unknown for 4 persons of the 1970 sample.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implementation of this algorithm could conceivably make it possible to merge student records even if a unique student ID were not available at all. Similar name‐based matching algorithms have been proposed elsewhere (Cohen, Ravikumar, & Fienberg, 2003; Newcombe, Fair, & Lalonde, 1992). In this case, the LND could be computed by comparing all N 1 names in the year 1 data file to all N 2 names in the year 2 data file.…”
Section: Generalizations Of the Lndmentioning
confidence: 99%