2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-016-1413-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of novel selectivity metrics in kinase research

Abstract: BackgroundCompound selectivity is an important issue when developing a new drug. In many instances, a lack of selectivity can translate to increased toxicity. Protein kinases are particularly concerned with this issue because they share high sequence and structural similarity. However, selectivity may be assessed early on using data generated from protein kinase profiling panels.ResultsTo guide lead optimization in drug discovery projects, we propose herein two new selectivity metrics, namely window score (WS)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alchemical free energy methods can be used to predict compound selectivity While the potency of a ligand for a single target is often quantified as a free energy of binding (Δ ,target ), there are a number of different metrics for quantifying compound selectivity [55,56]. Here, we consider the selectivity between one target and another (an antitarget) as the difference in free energy of binding for a given ligand between the two,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alchemical free energy methods can be used to predict compound selectivity While the potency of a ligand for a single target is often quantified as a free energy of binding (Δ ,target ), there are a number of different metrics for quantifying compound selectivity [55,56]. Here, we consider the selectivity between one target and another (an antitarget) as the difference in free energy of binding for a given ligand between the two,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We sent FP1 for kinome profiling against 403 wild-type (WT) kinases at DiscoverX at 1 μM. FP1 demonstrated good selectivity with an S 10 (1 μM) = 0.035 (61), corresponding to 14 kinases with a PoC < 10 at 1 μM ( Fig. 7C ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 B). Kinome-wide selectivity as well as biochemical potency on BRSK2 and related CAMK family kinases has been published for all except Arcyriaflavin A and K-252c 33 , 34 . In those cases where broad kinase screening data was available in the literature, we calculated the S 10 selectivity scores corresponding to the percentage of kinases inhibited > 90% at the concentration shown is included for each compound versus GW296115 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%