2013
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of PET/CT in radiotherapy planning: contribution of deformable registration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some attendees had experience with DIR for PET/CT‐pCT registration (26%). Within that group, there was agreement that in many cases, the uncertainties in DIR were equivalent or not significantly more than using RIR, given the innate uncertainties of using PET images 26–28 . This is disputed in some literature, which indicates it provides minimal value 15,29,30 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some attendees had experience with DIR for PET/CT‐pCT registration (26%). Within that group, there was agreement that in many cases, the uncertainties in DIR were equivalent or not significantly more than using RIR, given the innate uncertainties of using PET images 26–28 . This is disputed in some literature, which indicates it provides minimal value 15,29,30 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implementation of PET for RT planning is still under investigation in the clinic (103105) and preclinical research might provide new insights for combining PET with RT. Evidently, PET-based RT planning requires correct registration with the planning CT to obtain accurate treatment planning.…”
Section: Small Animal Pet-guided Radiation Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An accurate estimation of the lung tumour volume from [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (FDG PET-CT) is essential for diagnosis [1], radiotherapy planning [2,3] and therapy response assessment [4,5]. The manual definition of lung tumours on FDG PET-CT images is time consuming and prone to observer variation leading to an inaccurate estimation of the tumour volume [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%