2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2004.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of rapid-feedback evaluation methods to improve the retention rates of an HIV/AIDS healthcare intervention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Key elements of the framework include the following: a team-based approach, ongoing adaptations for more nascent programs, generation of actionable data, and use of rapid-feedback cycles (Hargreaves, 2014; McNall, Welch, Ruh, Mildner, & Soto, 2004). …”
Section: Data-to-action Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Key elements of the framework include the following: a team-based approach, ongoing adaptations for more nascent programs, generation of actionable data, and use of rapid-feedback cycles (Hargreaves, 2014; McNall, Welch, Ruh, Mildner, & Soto, 2004). …”
Section: Data-to-action Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of rapid research methodologies has been influenced by an acknowledgement of the importance of generating findings within time frames when they can still be actionable and used to inform improvements in care. As McNall and colleagues have argued, ‘the timeliness of information is no less critical than its accuracy.’5 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These feedbacks are used to optimise the performance of specific program processes allowing for rapid problem solving in the program operations. 7 Rapid-feedback evaluation method has been shown to be successful in evaluating programs. McNall et al 7 successfully used rapid-feedback evaluation method in the evaluation of a new health care intervention to improve the program process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The summative evaluations has the purpose of assisting in making decisions whether to terminate a program 8 or 'render judgments on the merit or worth of a program'. 7…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%