1977
DOI: 10.5465/ambpp.1977.4976896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of Reversal Design in Organizational Behavior Research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are a number of possible reasons why the reversal did not occur. Although reversals have a major advantage in that they help to overcome the problem of intersubject variability and can provide powerful evidence for cause-and-effect conclusions (Kazdin, 1973;Komaki, 1977), they assume that behavior changes made under the conditions of the intervention are capable of being reversed when the intervention is withdrawn (i.e., when there is a return to baseline & Bond, 1977). In the present study, learning is not so much the explanation for why the reversal did not occur as is the latter possibility of other contingencies in the environment taking over to maintain the behavior at intervention levels of frequency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are a number of possible reasons why the reversal did not occur. Although reversals have a major advantage in that they help to overcome the problem of intersubject variability and can provide powerful evidence for cause-and-effect conclusions (Kazdin, 1973;Komaki, 1977), they assume that behavior changes made under the conditions of the intervention are capable of being reversed when the intervention is withdrawn (i.e., when there is a return to baseline & Bond, 1977). In the present study, learning is not so much the explanation for why the reversal did not occur as is the latter possibility of other contingencies in the environment taking over to maintain the behavior at intervention levels of frequency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Miller (1973) explanation. In a series of seven case studies that used a reversal to evaluate the impact of a contingent reinforcement intervention on various individual employee's behavior in different work settings, it was found that in all cases the behavior was significantly changed by introducing the intervention, but in only four of the seven cases did a reversal occur (Luthans & Bond, 1977). In these case studies, and especially when compared with more highly controlled laboratory and institutional (mental hospitals and schools) studies in which reversals have traditionally been used, there does seem to be a definite relationship between the degree of environmental complexity in the study and the reversibility of the targeted behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The controlling influence of the intervention on three dependent variables offers convincing evidence that the independent variable did indeed cause the change in the dependent variables. A few other organizational behavior studies also have demonstrated the applicability of reversals (Gupton & Le Bow, 1971;Kreitner & Golab, 1978;Luthans & Bond, 1977;Luthans & Davis, 1979;Luthans & Maris, 1979;Marholin & Gray, 1976) and multiple baseline designs (Kreitner, Reif, & Morris, 1977;Lamal & Benfield, 1978;Luthans & Davis, 1979;Van Ness & Luthans, 1979). In other words, although considerably more studies need to be done in the future, already there is some evidence that idiographic research of interactive organizational behavior in real settings can be done effectively by single case experimenal designs.…”
Section: An Examplementioning
confidence: 98%