2004
DOI: 10.1080/0260293042000188465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of self, peer and teacher assessment as a feedback system in a learning environment aimed at fostering skills of cooperation in an entrepreneurial context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fifth, feedback can be positive or negative. Although some researchers argue that feedback should be positive (Scheeler, Ruhl, and McAfee 2004), others argue that negative feedback can motivate learners (Schelfhout, Dochy, and Janssens 2004), and some even argue that feedback is more effective when it is balanced between positive and negative comments (Weaver 2006). Sixth, the timing of feedback can be either delayed or immediate.…”
Section: Overview Of the Feedback Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fifth, feedback can be positive or negative. Although some researchers argue that feedback should be positive (Scheeler, Ruhl, and McAfee 2004), others argue that negative feedback can motivate learners (Schelfhout, Dochy, and Janssens 2004), and some even argue that feedback is more effective when it is balanced between positive and negative comments (Weaver 2006). Sixth, the timing of feedback can be either delayed or immediate.…”
Section: Overview Of the Feedback Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One article was not included in the model, because it did not propose or prove what feedback should be like (Schelfhout et al, 2004). Fourteen articles focused on student learning and six focused on (student) teachers.…”
Section: Social Constructivismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twenty-one articles reasoned from social constructivism: Licklider (1995), Black and Wiliam (1998), Tillema and Smith (2000), MacDonald (2001), Manouchehri (2002), Mory (2003), Schelfhout, Dochy, and Janssens (2004), Gibbs and Simpson (2004), Yang and Liu (2004), Weaver (2006), Hattie and Timperley (2007), Brandt (2008), Segers, Gijbels, and Thurlings (2008), Landry, Anthony, Swank, andMonseque-Bailey (2009), Fund (2010), Gielen, Peeters, Dochy, Onghena, and Struyven (2010), Kretlow and Bartholomew (2010), Li, Liu, and Steckelberg (2010), Martens, de Brabander, Rozendaal, Boekaerts, and Van der Leeden (2010), Colasante (2011), and Van der Kleij, Eggen, Timmers, and Veldkamp (2012).…”
Section: Data-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Varios trabajos durante esta década validan estas propuestas; también comprueban que involucrar a los estudiantes en la evaluación de los resultados de su aprendizaje (evaluación por pares, auto evaluación y coevaluación) es sustancialmente beneficioso para este propósito (Smyth, 2004;Schelfhout, Dochy y Janssens, 2004;Richardson, 2005;Taras, 2001Taras, , 2003.…”
Section: Criterios Y Estándares Para Evaluar El Aprendizaje En La Uniunclassified