2018
DOI: 10.18027/2224-5057-2018-8-3-39-48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of Submental Local Flap and Radial Free Flap for the Reconstruction of Defects in Patients With Oral Cancer

Abstract: Introduction.Due to anatomical features, surgical treatment of oral cancer can lead to significant functional and esthetic defects. Main methods of reconstruction can be divided into groups of local and free flaps. There are lots of publications devoted to reconstruction of defects of oral cavity with the use of local and free flaps, but only few of them contain the comparison of these methods in the aspect of functional results.Materials and methods.A total of 58 patients with oral cancer were included in our… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Observation Criteria. ① Comparison of clinical symptom scores: symptoms included insomnia, nausea and vomiting, pain, fatigue, and diarrhea and were rated (on a 0-100 scale) by reference to the visual analogue scale (VSA) for pain, with lower scores indicating less symptoms ② Comparison of CR: complications included incision infection, necrosis of skin flap, wound bleeding, and stress ulcer ③ Comparison of UW-QOL scores: the score was rated based on the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UW-QOL) of head and neck cancer patients on a scale of 0-100, with lower scores indicating worse quality of life [8][9][10][11] ④ Investigation on factors affecting patients' quality of life, which was carried out by self-designed questionnaire ⑤ Comparison of negative emotion scores of patients after intervention. The scores (on a scale of 0-100) of patients' self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS) were compared, with higher scores indicating heavier negative emotion [12][13][14][15] 2.6.…”
Section: Nursing Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observation Criteria. ① Comparison of clinical symptom scores: symptoms included insomnia, nausea and vomiting, pain, fatigue, and diarrhea and were rated (on a 0-100 scale) by reference to the visual analogue scale (VSA) for pain, with lower scores indicating less symptoms ② Comparison of CR: complications included incision infection, necrosis of skin flap, wound bleeding, and stress ulcer ③ Comparison of UW-QOL scores: the score was rated based on the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UW-QOL) of head and neck cancer patients on a scale of 0-100, with lower scores indicating worse quality of life [8][9][10][11] ④ Investigation on factors affecting patients' quality of life, which was carried out by self-designed questionnaire ⑤ Comparison of negative emotion scores of patients after intervention. The scores (on a scale of 0-100) of patients' self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS) were compared, with higher scores indicating heavier negative emotion [12][13][14][15] 2.6.…”
Section: Nursing Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%