2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0731-7085(01)00659-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of the Box–Behnken experimental design in the optimisation and robustness testing of a capillary electrophoresis method for the analysis of ethambutol hydrochloride in a pharmaceutical formulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
63
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The combinations of variables are at the midpoints of the edges of the process space and at the center. 18) This method is advantageous over other response surface methodologies as it avoids combination of extreme factors. Also, it does not contain combinations for which all factors are simultaneously at their highest or lowest levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combinations of variables are at the midpoints of the edges of the process space and at the center. 18) This method is advantageous over other response surface methodologies as it avoids combination of extreme factors. Also, it does not contain combinations for which all factors are simultaneously at their highest or lowest levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 A modified central composite experimental design, Box-Behnken design, is an independent, rotatable or nearly rotatable quadratic design (contains no embedded factorial or fractional factorial design), in which the treatment combinations are at the midpoints of the edges of the process space and at the center. 15 Among all the RSM designs, Box-Behnken design requires fewer runs (15 runs) in a 3-factor experimental design. A 3-factor, 3-level design would require a total of 27 unique runs without any repetitions and a total of 30 runs with 3 repetitions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison with the central composite design, the Box-Behnken design requires relatively few experiments and offers higher efficiency. The Box-Behnken design requires not all influencing factors to be at a high level at the same time and ensures that all the experimental conditions are within a safe operating area (Ragonese et al 2002;Kehoe and Stokes 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%