2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of the exponential Drucker-Prager material model for defining the failure loads of the mono and bi-adhesive joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results showed a remarkable improvement in low cycle fatigue life of the joint with a length ratio of 0.2 which is 25 times higher than single adhesive. Since the ductile adhesives have more capacity to extend the plastic zone between the two substrates, they are more fatigue resistant 22,26 . So, using the ductile adhesive at bonding edges could effectively prevent the premature failure of SLJs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Results showed a remarkable improvement in low cycle fatigue life of the joint with a length ratio of 0.2 which is 25 times higher than single adhesive. Since the ductile adhesives have more capacity to extend the plastic zone between the two substrates, they are more fatigue resistant 22,26 . So, using the ductile adhesive at bonding edges could effectively prevent the premature failure of SLJs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the samples had the same geometrical parameters but different adhesive length ratios defined as L 1 /L. According to previous studies, [21][22][23] the optimum length ratio is about 0.1 to 0.3 for different loading conditions and joint configurations. It should be noted that the maximum length ratio is 0.5 corresponding to a joint where the total overlap is covered by the ductile adhesive.…”
Section: Slj Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, such criteria are not suited to model adhesives [34], given that these materials are sensitive to both hydrostatic stress and shear components. The exponential-based Drucker Prager yield criterion, which is an extension of the von Mises yield criterion [33,35], considers the sensitivity of adhesives to hydrostatic stresses and is found to be a sound criterion to model failure in adhesives; thus, it is utilised in the study.…”
Section: Materials Damage Model Considered For the Adhesivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adhesive used in the conventional blade-type in the paper is Araldite 2015 [36], which is a ductile adhesive from Huntsman. The material data for the adhesive are derived from [35] and are listed in Table 3. A very brief explanation of the exponential-based Drucker-Prager model is provided below.…”
Section: Materials Damage Model Considered For the Adhesivementioning
confidence: 99%