1991
DOI: 10.1093/geronj/46.4.m139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of the Karnofsky Performance Scale in Determining Outcomes and Risk in Geriatric Outpatients

Abstract: The Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) was evaluated in a geriatric outpatient population with regard to three issues: its strength of association with widely used and validated geriatric instruments; its ability to predict patient outcomes; and its ability to serve as an identifier of high-risk patients. The 134-patient sample was given a comprehensive geriatric assessment which included the KPS, the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale, the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) scale, and other psy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
183
0
18

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 299 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
183
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…The ANCOVA was performed with a Greenhouse-Geisser correction, and statistical significance is reported inclusive of a Bonferroni correction. For variables where significant group/ to have a Karnofsky performance score of 50 to 80 (ie, "requires occasional assistance, but is able to care for most of his personal needs" to "normal activity with effort; some signs or symptoms of disease"), 17 indicative of moderate disability. Participants were eligible if they had an International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) 18 score indicating low or moderate physical activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ANCOVA was performed with a Greenhouse-Geisser correction, and statistical significance is reported inclusive of a Bonferroni correction. For variables where significant group/ to have a Karnofsky performance score of 50 to 80 (ie, "requires occasional assistance, but is able to care for most of his personal needs" to "normal activity with effort; some signs or symptoms of disease"), 17 indicative of moderate disability. Participants were eligible if they had an International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) 18 score indicating low or moderate physical activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, it is difficult to get a reliable measure of pre-antibiotic quality of life since BSI is an unexpected event, although a measure of "functional status" (e.g. the Karnofsky score [6]) may be more readily determined pre-BSI. The panel concluded that such measures are clearly important for patients, but lack sufficiently robust measurements at the present time to permit their use as primary endpoints, but may be suitable for secondary endpoints.…”
Section: Subjective Clinical Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each patient, general data (gender and age), mean length of stay, number of illnesses, admission functional status (activities of daily living = ADL, instrumental activities of daily living = IADL, Karnofsky performance status) (Katz et al, 1963;Lawton and Brody, 1969;Crooks et al, 1991), comorbidity level (Cumulative Illness Rating Scale = CIRS) (Conwell et al, 1993) and severity of diseases (acute physiology and chronic health evaluation = APACHE II) (Knaus et al, 1985) were collected from the clinical records. Laboratory data such as hemoglobin, white blood cell count, platelet count and albumin were collected too.…”
Section: The Study Poolmentioning
confidence: 99%