2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000181726.32675.37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of topical nonabsorbable gastrointestinal antifungal prophylaxis to prevent fungal infections in critically ill immunocompetent patients: A meta-analysis

Abstract: In critically ill immunocompetent patients who are at high risk of fungal infection, topical nonabsorbable gastrointestinal antifungal prophylaxis was associated with a reduced incidence of urinary fungal infections and a trend toward reduction in respiratory fungal infections and fungemia. Limitations in study data are such that many of these infections may have represented superficial infections of uncertain clinical importance; a large, randomized, controlled trial is needed to assess the cost-effectiveness… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this review generally confirm the conclusions of earlier reviews examining the separate effects on yeast infections of SDD [ 30 , 32 ] or SAP [ 33 - 35 ]. However, these reviews have some shortcomings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The results of this review generally confirm the conclusions of earlier reviews examining the separate effects on yeast infections of SDD [ 30 , 32 ] or SAP [ 33 - 35 ]. However, these reviews have some shortcomings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In critically ill patients and solid organ transplant recipients prophylaxis using fluconazole is effective in avoiding invasive candidiasis [73,74]. Using topical non-absorbable antifungal prophylaxis in immunocompetent critically ill patients leads also to a significant reduction in fungal (mainly non-invasive) infections [75]. According to the BSR, prophylaxis with nystatin, amphotericin or fluconazole should be considered in all AAV patients receiving high-dose immunosuppressive therapy [57].…”
Section: Types Of Infection and Options For Prophylaxismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, no adverse effects of nystatin are reported and its low‐cost makes the use highly cost‐effective . A meta‐analysis of Ho et al on critically ill patients demonstrated a significant reduction in urinary tract fungal infections, and 2 other works considered the risk of Candida infection, with and without nystatin prophylaxis, in very low birth weight infants and patients with burn injury . Giglio and coworkers showed that nystatin prophylaxis significantly reduces fungal colonisation in surgical/trauma ICU patients, even if already colonised, since colonisation can be observed on admission in up to 50% of ICU patients …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%