2020
DOI: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2020.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The utility of bank voles for studying prion disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been also used to assess the zoonotic potential of animal prion diseases such as BSE, scrapie, CWD, and atypical prion diseases. For instance, studies have confirmed that PMCA exhibits species specificity that faithfully reflects the same transmission barrier observed in animals in vivo [ 1 , 10 , 16 , 28 ]. When BSE and scrapie were examined for their capability to convert human PrP with the three major polymorphic variants ( PRNP codon 129 MM, MV and VV) expressed in the humanized transgenic mouse brain [ 5 , 17 ], cattle BSE prions was able to trigger the efficient conversion of human PrP with a preference similar to that of human vCJD (MM > MV > VV) while scrapie failed to convert the human substrates [ 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It has been also used to assess the zoonotic potential of animal prion diseases such as BSE, scrapie, CWD, and atypical prion diseases. For instance, studies have confirmed that PMCA exhibits species specificity that faithfully reflects the same transmission barrier observed in animals in vivo [ 1 , 10 , 16 , 28 ]. When BSE and scrapie were examined for their capability to convert human PrP with the three major polymorphic variants ( PRNP codon 129 MM, MV and VV) expressed in the humanized transgenic mouse brain [ 5 , 17 ], cattle BSE prions was able to trigger the efficient conversion of human PrP with a preference similar to that of human vCJD (MM > MV > VV) while scrapie failed to convert the human substrates [ 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Proteins were then dissolved in the sample buffer (3% SDS, 3% β-mercaptoethanol, 2 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 62.5 mM Tris, pH 6.8, Merck) and boiled for 5 min. An equivalent of 0.4 mg of wet tissue was loaded on 13% SDS-PAGE gels, and the proteins were transferred onto PVDF membrane (Immobilon P, Millipore, Merck Life Science, Milano, Italy) for 2 h at 60 V. Membranes were blocked with 1% non-fat dry milk in TBST (10 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween-20, pH 7.5) for 1 h at 37 °C and incubated overnight at 4 °C with anti-PrP monoclonal antibodies 3F4 and SA21 [ 33 ]. According to the producer, 3F4 (1:5000, Covance, Princeton, NJ, USA, catalog# SIG-39620) recognizes the human PrP sequence between 109 and 112, while our SA21 (1:1000) distinguishes between residues 165 and 185 of both unglycosylated PrP and PrP glycosylated at position 197, but it does not recognize PrP isoforms glycosylated at 181 [ 33 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having established a method that allows to reliably identify all relevant PrP C proteoforms, we next aimed at comparing the endoproteolytic processing of PrP C of bank voles and wild type mice, two rodent models that show different susceptibility to prion diseases (64)(65)(66)(67)(68)(69)(70)(71). We first aimed to confirm antibodies reactivity in mouse brain and found that all antibodies but EP1802Y equally detected vole and mouse PrPs (Suppl.…”
Section: Endoproteolytic Processing Of Prp C In Wild Type Micementioning
confidence: 99%