2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The utility of capsule endoscopy and its role for diagnosing pathology in the gastrointestinal tract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5,6-10 Retention rates reported in the large sample size studies ranged from 0 to 2.4%. 3,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10]25 The risk of retention is high in patients with prolonged nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, abdominal radiation injury, extensive CD, 35 and previous major abdominal surgery or small-bowel resection. 36 In a recent large study evaluating the capsule retention, Li et al 3 found that the retention rate was 1.4%, the same as the pooled rate of this review, but the most common reason in their study was nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced enteropathy (11 of 14), whereas CD was the most common reason in Other included capsule endoscopes that remained in the GI tract at the time of the article preparation (n Z 2), laparoscopically removed (n Z 1), and vomited out (n Z 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…5,6-10 Retention rates reported in the large sample size studies ranged from 0 to 2.4%. 3,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10]25 The risk of retention is high in patients with prolonged nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, abdominal radiation injury, extensive CD, 35 and previous major abdominal surgery or small-bowel resection. 36 In a recent large study evaluating the capsule retention, Li et al 3 found that the retention rate was 1.4%, the same as the pooled rate of this review, but the most common reason in their study was nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced enteropathy (11 of 14), whereas CD was the most common reason in Other included capsule endoscopes that remained in the GI tract at the time of the article preparation (n Z 2), laparoscopically removed (n Z 1), and vomited out (n Z 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7][8][9][10]29 The several factors account for incomplete examination, of which battery exhaustion is the most common reason, followed by capsule retention, technical failure, and poor small-bowel preparation. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]25,29 Battery exhaustion can easily occur in patients with delayed gastric emptying, with the capsule failing to enter the duodenum or remaining in the stomach for more than 1.5 hours. Therefore, efforts should be made to identify patients who are more likely to have delayed gastric emptying.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Study completion rates vary based on the indication, with the higher end approaching 80-85% [1]. Several factors such as inadequate battery life in the setting of delayed gastrointestinal (GI) transit, poor SB preparation and capsule retention have been cited as primary reasons for incomplete examinations [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%