2013
DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The utility of low frequency heart rate variability as an index of sympathetic cardiac tone: A review with emphasis on a reanalysis of previous studies

Abstract: This article evaluates the suitability of low frequency (LF) heart rate variability (HRV) as an index of sympathetic cardiac control and the LF/high frequency (HF) ratio as an index of autonomic balance. It includes a comprehensive literature review and a reanalysis of some previous studies on autonomic cardiovascular regulation. The following sources of evidence are addressed: effects of manipulations affecting sympathetic and vagal activity on HRV, predictions of group differences in cardiac autonomic regula… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
611
4
11

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 790 publications
(649 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
23
611
4
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, it has now been established that LF is not an index of pure sympathetic activity, but a mix of sympathetic, parasympathetic, and baroreflex influences (Shaffer, McCraty, & Zerr, 2014). This interpretation issue makes it problematic to use LF/HF as an index of sympathovagal balance (Reyes del Paso, Langewitz, Mulder, van Roon, & Duschek, 2013), which is why we decided not to report this ratio, although it is still widely used in the literature. Besides, LF/HF is anyway redundant information with LFnu and HFnu, these three measures being mathematically equivalent and displaying a curvilinear relationship (Heathers, 2014).…”
Section: Chosen Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, it has now been established that LF is not an index of pure sympathetic activity, but a mix of sympathetic, parasympathetic, and baroreflex influences (Shaffer, McCraty, & Zerr, 2014). This interpretation issue makes it problematic to use LF/HF as an index of sympathovagal balance (Reyes del Paso, Langewitz, Mulder, van Roon, & Duschek, 2013), which is why we decided not to report this ratio, although it is still widely used in the literature. Besides, LF/HF is anyway redundant information with LFnu and HFnu, these three measures being mathematically equivalent and displaying a curvilinear relationship (Heathers, 2014).…”
Section: Chosen Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectral power was expressed in ms 2 and integrated into two frequency bands of interest: the high frequency (HF) power band (0.15–0.40 Hz), which reflects the parasympathetic influence and is related to the respiratory sinus arrhythmia [20], and the low frequency (LF) power band (0.04–0.15 Hz), which is assumed to have a dominant sympathetic component [21]. In addition, the LF band has been associated with modulation of cardiac autonomic outflows by baroreflexes [22].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of some controversy [37], it is commonly accepted that LF is associated with sympathetic activity [8,11], i.e., variations in the low-frequency PSD values from HRV reflect changes in the sympathetic nervous system. On the other hand, HF has been related to the respiratory rhythms and, therefore, to the parasympathetic activity [8,11].…”
Section: Analysis In Frequency Domain: Spectral Entropymentioning
confidence: 99%