1994
DOI: 10.1212/wnl.44.7.1191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The utility of neuroimaging in the evaluation of headache in patients with normal neurologic examinations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
74
2
6

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
74
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Only 0.4% of a total of 897 migraineurs harbored an intracranial lesion disclosed by either CT or MRI (3 tumors and 1 MAV) 6 . As a result of such very low prevalence of serious intracranial lesions, the Quality Standards Subcommittee stated that "in adult patients with recurrent headaches that have been defined as migraine -including those with visual aura -with no recent change in pattern, no history of seizures, and no other focal neurologic signs or symptoms, the routine use of neuroimaging is not warranted."…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only 0.4% of a total of 897 migraineurs harbored an intracranial lesion disclosed by either CT or MRI (3 tumors and 1 MAV) 6 . As a result of such very low prevalence of serious intracranial lesions, the Quality Standards Subcommittee stated that "in adult patients with recurrent headaches that have been defined as migraine -including those with visual aura -with no recent change in pattern, no history of seizures, and no other focal neurologic signs or symptoms, the routine use of neuroimaging is not warranted."…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,17 The yield from neuroimaging, though low, is not zero. 18,19 The dilemma is that many headache patients, even in the United Kingdom, which operates a family physician system, remain unassured after neurological consultation, and some may request further investigations. 20 In a health care system equipped to provide superior follow-up care, patients might accept reassurance reluctantly while neuroimaging is deferred until a change in their clinical condition warrants it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 In a health care system equipped to provide superior follow-up care, patients might accept reassurance reluctantly while neuroimaging is deferred until a change in their clinical condition warrants it. 15,19 Chronic headache which has not changed in character may, however, be associated with brain tumor. 21,22 Where neurological expertise is in short supply and follow-up is uncertain, the cost and inconvenience of repeated visits to clinics far removed from patients in the hope of a "cure" for chronic isolated headache, the economic cost of lost time and reduced effectiveness of performance at work, 23 and the anxiety engendered by a perceived potentially lifethreatening ailment, may influence the need for earlier neuroimaging in the investigation of the headache patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En yaygõn görüleni bizim olgumuzda da görülen ve tanõyõ şiddetle destekleyen pakimeningeal kalõnlaşma ve yoğun kontrast tutulumudur. 4,5,10 Spinal, özellikle de servikal bölge MRG'sinde sõk olarak anterior internal vertebral pleksusta önemli dilatasyon ve de higromalar görülebileceği bildirilmiştir. 4 Bizim olgumuzun spinal MRG'leri normal bulunmuştur.…”
Section: 4912unclassified
“…Kraniyal MRG'de tipik sayõla-bilecek, diffüz pakimeningeal kalõnlaşma ve gadolinum tutulumu görülür. 10,11 Daha nadir olarak subdural koleksiyon, serebral venöz sinüslerde tõkanma, pitüiter glandda genişleme veya ventriküllerde küçülme görülebilir. http://www.ctf.istanbul.edu.tr/dergi/online/2002v33/s3/023o2.pdf U Klinikten sorumlu olan genellikle spontan olarak ortaya çõkmõş dural bir yõrtõk ve oradan BOS sõzmasõna bağlõ olarak BOS volüm ve basõncõnõn azalmasõdõr.…”
unclassified