1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0149-7189(97)00002-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The utilization of the logic model as a system level planning and evaluation device

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
66
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…More simply, it is a picture or diagram showing what is going to be done, and what the expected results of the program or evaluation are (Farell et al 2002), or a method of identifying and measuring the impacts of systems, organizations, or institutions (Julian 1997). In our analyses, a logic model was used to understand the system impacts of Islamic microfinance or community goals through the implementation of multiple short-term interventions (Figure 3.6).…”
Section: Data Evaluation and Validation: Triangulation And A Logic Momentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More simply, it is a picture or diagram showing what is going to be done, and what the expected results of the program or evaluation are (Farell et al 2002), or a method of identifying and measuring the impacts of systems, organizations, or institutions (Julian 1997). In our analyses, a logic model was used to understand the system impacts of Islamic microfinance or community goals through the implementation of multiple short-term interventions (Figure 3.6).…”
Section: Data Evaluation and Validation: Triangulation And A Logic Momentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 summarizes each activity area and details how they differ across a number of dimensions. These dimensions are drawn from systems program planning and include how need is defined, the focus of activities, level of beneficiary engagement, typical outputs, and intended outcomes [27,28].…”
Section: Program Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to point out that the right hand side of the model (outcomes) is dependent on the left hand side (input, output) so that the full chain consists of Input-Output-Outcome, with each specific output constructed to affect specific outcomes. The most commonly used method in evaluation research for conceptualizing the change and action theories is through the development of a causal chain (also called model, link, attribution or pathway) [6,11,15] from which a program logic model is developed, although often the terms causal chain or model and logic models are used interchangeably [4,8,12,26,39,[61][62][63][64][65][66][67]. The causal chain represents a series of steps of causal assumptions along a continuum that reflect the change theory underlying the intervention [5,6,11,15].…”
Section: Conceptual Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%