2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The validity of Geriatric Nutrition Risk Index: Simple tool for prediction of nutritional-related complication of hospitalized elderly patients. Comparison with Mini Nutritional Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
87
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
5
87
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, GNRI, the nutritional screening tool in our study, was clinically more useful because it is well‐validated, less time‐consuming, and did not require skilled personnel 42. Furthermore, GNRI has a higher prognostic value for classification of nutrition‐related complication in elderly patients than the Mini‐Nutritional Assessment test 27. It should be noted that the ideal BMI in this study was 22 kg/m 2 , which was more appropriate for Asian populations 28.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, GNRI, the nutritional screening tool in our study, was clinically more useful because it is well‐validated, less time‐consuming, and did not require skilled personnel 42. Furthermore, GNRI has a higher prognostic value for classification of nutrition‐related complication in elderly patients than the Mini‐Nutritional Assessment test 27. It should be noted that the ideal BMI in this study was 22 kg/m 2 , which was more appropriate for Asian populations 28.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…A simple and well‐established tool, the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI),26, 27 was used to assess the nutritional risk of each participant and calculated as follows: GNRI=[1.489×albumin (g/L)]+[41.7×(actual weight/ideal weight)] 26. The ideal weight was calculated by the Lorentz formula 26.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identifying possible nutritional risk/malnutrition is 57 important and may affect trajectory of health, morbidity, and mortality [1][2][3][4] . Different 58 screening methods exist including the 'malnutrition universal screening tool' 59 (MUST) 1,5 , the 'mini-nutritional assessment' (MNA) 1,[6][7][8] and the 'geriatric nutritional 60 risk index', (GNRI) 9 . In the United Kingdom (UK), the MUST is the standard routine 61 method of screening in all hospital wards and care homes, although in reality there is 62 no universal gold standard tool 4 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important area to address which overlaps malnutrition is 'cachexia'/'cachexia-79 risk', as acute and chronic illness has a typical effect upon food intake (anorexia) and include important blood markers such as albumin, which is utilised in the GNRI 9 , and 84 is a well known prognostic marker [13][14][15][16] . C-reactive protein (CRP) is another routine 85 blood marker indicating inflammatory status and has known prognostic potential 17,18 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its usefulness in predicting poor outcomes has also been reported for various co-morbidities such as stroke [3], heart failure [4,5], and for hospitalized patients [6,7]. Moreover, GNRI is useful in ascertaining disease prognosis in patients on maintenance dialysis [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%