1972
DOI: 10.3109/00365517209081068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Validity of Strain Gauge Plethysmography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mercury-in-rubber strain gauges measure the change in volume of only a small segment of the limb. However, when the gauge is placed around the largest circumference of the calf, this method reliably measures limb blood flow [13]. Mercury-in-rubber straingauge plethysmographs are portable and much simpler to use than the other instruments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mercury-in-rubber strain gauges measure the change in volume of only a small segment of the limb. However, when the gauge is placed around the largest circumference of the calf, this method reliably measures limb blood flow [13]. Mercury-in-rubber straingauge plethysmographs are portable and much simpler to use than the other instruments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Withinsubject reproducibility has been assessed by several groups, with a reported variation coefficient of between 11% and 15% [11][12]19]. Calf blood flow measured by SGP has been shown to correlate strongly with femoral blood flow measured by both Doppler ultrasound [11,20] and direct limb perfusion via cannulation of the femoral artery and vein [21]. It is considered to be a reliable and accurate measure of blood flow to the extremities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basal forearm blood flow (FBF) was measured with the participant seated upright, using Hokanson Plethysmography with a venous occlusion technique. Strain gauge plethysmography has been validated against machine flow and Doppler ultrasound . A voltage‐dependent silastic mercury strain gauge sized 2‐3 cm less than the right forearm circumference was attached to the forearm 5 cm distal from the cubital fossa and secured with tape.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%