2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10648-012-9210-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Value of Applied Research: Retrieval Practice Improves Classroom Learning and Recommendations from a Teacher, a Principal, and a Scientist

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
90
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
90
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This robustness of the testing effect to changes in the procedure may be especially important, given its potential to increase long-term retention in applied educational settings. In particular, researchers have recommended using retrieval practice both in the classroom and as a student study strategy to increase learning (e.g., Agarwal, Bain, & Chamberlain, 2012;Roediger, Putnam, & Smith, 2011). Because the testing effect does not seem to be affected by practice format under our conditions, the benefits are as great in blocked as in mixed practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This robustness of the testing effect to changes in the procedure may be especially important, given its potential to increase long-term retention in applied educational settings. In particular, researchers have recommended using retrieval practice both in the classroom and as a student study strategy to increase learning (e.g., Agarwal, Bain, & Chamberlain, 2012;Roediger, Putnam, & Smith, 2011). Because the testing effect does not seem to be affected by practice format under our conditions, the benefits are as great in blocked as in mixed practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Test-enhanced learning promotes long-term knowledge retention, [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] while the length of time that the information is retained is dependent upon the spacing between repetitions. [1][2][3][4][5][6] Because spacing interval between repetitions in our study was one day, the spacing effect predicted the information would be retained for one week or 7 days, after which the forgetting process would occur.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,16,[20][21][22] Furthermore, providing students with immediate detailed feedback to responses enhances the testing effect compared with students who do not receive an explanation for the responses. 2,23,24 This feedback also serves as a way to reinforce important course concepts on a larger scale than is obtained with traditional in-class active-learning assignments; thus, it should be able to artificially lengthen the spacing interval between exposures to material, thereby lengthening the retention interval.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pokaždé, když si poznatek vybavíme, je posílena schopnost jeho použití v budoucnosti. Výzkumy také dokazují, že opakování formou testů v MOOC zlepšuje schopnost dlouhodobého zapamatování více než poslech prezentace a následné použití poznatků ve standardních domácích zadáních [13]. K lepším studijním výsledkům přispívá interaktivita poskytující okamžitou zpětnou vazbu, možnost poskytování zpětné vazby od ostatních studentů a hodnocení vlastního výkonu.…”
Section: Vysvětlení Pojmu Mooc [11]unclassified