2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-2166-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The value of computed tomography based navigation in revision total hip arthroplasty

Abstract: Purpose This study investigates the accuracy of a computed tomography (CT)-based navigation system for accurate acetabular component placement during revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods We performed a retrospective review of 30 hips in 26 patients who underwent cementless revision THA using a CT-based navigation system; the control group consisted of 25 hips in 25 patients who underwent cementless primary THA using the same system. We analysed the deviation of anteversion and inclination angles amon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All reference points were manually copied from the preoperative plan onto the postoperative CT. Computer-aided design (CAD) models of the APS were manually superimposed onto the postoperative multiplanar reconstruction in CT images, as described in previous reports [10,11]. We measured the postoperative stem anteversion (Fig.…”
Section: Postoperative Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All reference points were manually copied from the preoperative plan onto the postoperative CT. Computer-aided design (CAD) models of the APS were manually superimposed onto the postoperative multiplanar reconstruction in CT images, as described in previous reports [10,11]. We measured the postoperative stem anteversion (Fig.…”
Section: Postoperative Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, because of the problems that arise with the use of a navigation system in revision THA, it is uncertain whether the acetabular cup position achieves similar accuracy as that obtained in primary THA. However, Nakamura et al18) and Kuroda et al19) achieved the same accuracy with CT-based navigation for primary and revision THA. Additionally, in a study by Chang et al,20) the optimal cup position was achieved with a very high probability: achievements in radiographic abduction and that in combined anteversion were both 100%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Furthermore, the combination of the cemented cup and navigation system is more useful for revision cases [7] , [8] . A massive bone defect is sometimes caused by the removal of the primary implanted cup; in that case, the frequency of using a cemented cup has increased.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%