2015
DOI: 10.1111/coa.12425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The value of postoperative anticoagulants to improve flap survival in the free radial forearm flap: a systematic review and retrospective multicentre analysis

Abstract: Background Free radial forearm flap (FRFF) reconstruction is a valuable technique in head and neck surgery, that allows closure of large defects while striving to maintain functionality. Anticoagulative drugs are often administered to improve flap survival, although evidence regarding effectiveness is lacking. Objective of review To investigate the effectiveness of postoperative anticoagulants to improve survival of the FRFF in head and neck reconstruction. Type of review Systematic review and multicenter,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, studies in which no anticoagulation was used demonstrated flap failure, thrombosis, and hematoma rates that were similar to the rates of the various anticoagulation therapies . This may suggest that anticoagulation offers no or minimal improvement in flap survival and could be an unnecessary adjunct to postoperative care in this complex population, with studies proving that anticoagulation drugs have minimal effect on free flap survival or flap‐related complications . Regardless, the side effects of many anticoagulation medications can lead to significant complications of which the reconstructive surgeon needs to be aware.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, studies in which no anticoagulation was used demonstrated flap failure, thrombosis, and hematoma rates that were similar to the rates of the various anticoagulation therapies . This may suggest that anticoagulation offers no or minimal improvement in flap survival and could be an unnecessary adjunct to postoperative care in this complex population, with studies proving that anticoagulation drugs have minimal effect on free flap survival or flap‐related complications . Regardless, the side effects of many anticoagulation medications can lead to significant complications of which the reconstructive surgeon needs to be aware.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,18,21 This may suggest that anticoagulation offers no or minimal improvement in flap survival and could be an unnecessary adjunct to postoperative care in this complex population, with studies proving that anticoagulation drugs have minimal effect on free flap survival or flap-related complications. 32 Regardless, the side effects of many anticoagulation medications can lead to significant complications of which the reconstructive surgeon needs to be aware. Aspirin can cause nephrotoxicity and gastric ulceration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 Reviews of aspirin use in microsurgical breast, and head and neck reconstructions have not demonstrated improved flap success and an increased rate of bleeding. 41,42 Additionally, a Cochrane meta-analysis of antiplatelet agents in peripheral arterial bypasses found no benefit of aspirin in the patency of autogenous bypasses. 43 Commonly described anticoagulants include heparin and LMWH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,5,25,47 Unfortunately, these studies are limited by insufficient sample size to adequately assess the effect of various interventions on relatively rare events such as flap thrombosis and failure or are not designed to assess potential impacts in specific patient populations like those in our study. 42 Additionally, the available literature does not assess the potential role of newer anticoagulants, which effectively prevent thrombosis while allowing physiological hemostasis. 48 Even with the assistance of hematologists, optimal regimens will likely need further clarification and will likely vary for each individual.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microvascular procedures, including free flap reconstructions, replantantion, and revascularizations, are commonly used in head, neck, breast, and extremity surgery with estimated success rates of 80 to 99%. 1,2 While failure rates are low, flap or replant loss is most commonly caused by thrombosis at the anastomoses. 3,4 Anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents are often administered perioperatively to help minimize the risk for microvascular thrombosis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%