2015
DOI: 10.1002/lary.25326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The value of 18FFDGPET/CT imaging in oral cavity cancer patients following surgical reconstruction

Abstract: 4.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…computerized tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or positron emission tomography (PET)). However, early detection of recurrent disease is challenging due to lymph nodal micrometastases and radiation or surgery induced fibrosis and inflammation, obscuring residual or recurrent tumor tissue [13]. Accurate and timely detection of locoregional metastases and recurrent disease is pivotal as survival rates rapidly decline with late detection and delayed salvage surgery [4, 5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…computerized tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or positron emission tomography (PET)). However, early detection of recurrent disease is challenging due to lymph nodal micrometastases and radiation or surgery induced fibrosis and inflammation, obscuring residual or recurrent tumor tissue [13]. Accurate and timely detection of locoregional metastases and recurrent disease is pivotal as survival rates rapidly decline with late detection and delayed salvage surgery [4, 5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, potential tumor resectability is not only assessed at baseline but also during follow‐up, if curative surgical therapy is contemplated or if local tumor recurrence is suspected. PET/CT is known to be helpful in previously treated patients because surgery and chemoradiotherapy result in anatomic changes that are difficult to characterize by CT or MRI alone . Contrast‐enhanced MRI is considered superior to contrast‐enhanced CT for the assessment of PNS and skull base invasion because of its intrinsic high soft tissue contrast and absence of beam‐hardening artifacts elicited by bones .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PET/ CT is known to be helpful in previously treated patients because surgery and chemoradiotherapy result in anatomic changes that are difficult to characterize by CT or MRI alone. 3,5,6 Contrast-enhanced MRI is considered superior to contrast-enhanced CT for the assessment of PNS and skull base invasion because of its intrinsic high soft tissue contrast and absence of beam-hardening artifacts elicited by bones. [7][8][9] PET/CT is additionally limited in tumors extending to the skull base because of spillover from adjacent 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG)-avid brain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…has published results of surveillance monitoring PET/CT in OSCC treated with surgical resection; but in their reported cohort of 17 patients only 9 received radiation therapy. (17) In our study of OSCC patients managed with definitive resection and adjuvant (chemo)RT, surveillance PET/CT 3 months after therapy uncovered 20.4% of patients with new locoregional or distant disease, and 25.9% of all patients (14 of 54 patients) ultimately developed recurrent malignancy within 1 year of their post-therapy surveillance PET/CT. These recurrence rates are reflective of a high-risk population with locoregionally advanced disease requiring close surveillance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%