DS 117: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE 2022), London S 2022
DOI: 10.35199/epde.2022.71
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Value of Unintended Human Behaviour in Everyday Product Design

Abstract: Everyday product design strives to identify a fit between people and technology towards higher usability and more human-centric design approaches regarding product concept ideation. Notwithstanding, limited discussions on unintended human behaviour in interaction design studies and ambiguous methods to interpret the daily phenomena in design activities deter a sound understanding of humanproduct interaction and communication: a vital criterion for designer's education purpose. This study aims to disclose a pat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Source: Krippendorff, 1989) For instance, Krippendorff (1989) provides a perspective on product semantics as part of studying to understand users' understanding of their practices of interfacing with designed things and provides strategies for designing products that can either afford or supportively intervene in that understanding. Vermol et al (2020) and Hassan et al (2022) agree these messages are carried by the shape of the physical product (the combination of shape, color, texture, structure, etc.) and are ultimately decoded by the user (the recipient of the message).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…(Source: Krippendorff, 1989) For instance, Krippendorff (1989) provides a perspective on product semantics as part of studying to understand users' understanding of their practices of interfacing with designed things and provides strategies for designing products that can either afford or supportively intervene in that understanding. Vermol et al (2020) and Hassan et al (2022) agree these messages are carried by the shape of the physical product (the combination of shape, color, texture, structure, etc.) and are ultimately decoded by the user (the recipient of the message).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%