2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2006.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The value relevance of management’s research and development reporting choice: Evidence from Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
74
0
12

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
5
74
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with the signaling argument, Abrahams and Sidhu (1998); Ahmed and Falk (2006), and Ang, Church, and Feng (2008) researched Australian firms and found that capitalized R&D expenditures are value-relevant to investors. Wyatt (2005), further supports such findings, noting that, in Australia, the capitalization of intangible assets primarily reflects underlying economic conditions.…”
Section: Evidence On Opportunism Versus Signaling Of Capitalized Randd mentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistent with the signaling argument, Abrahams and Sidhu (1998); Ahmed and Falk (2006), and Ang, Church, and Feng (2008) researched Australian firms and found that capitalized R&D expenditures are value-relevant to investors. Wyatt (2005), further supports such findings, noting that, in Australia, the capitalization of intangible assets primarily reflects underlying economic conditions.…”
Section: Evidence On Opportunism Versus Signaling Of Capitalized Randd mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…11 Previous research in favor of R&D capitalization typically explores English-legal-origin countries such as the United States (e.g., Healy et al, 2002;Krishnan & Wang, 2014), the U.K. (e.g., Green et al, 1996;Oswald & Zarowin, 2007a), or Australia (e.g., Abrahams & Sidhu, 1998;Ahmed & Falk, 2006;Ang et al, 2008;Wyatt, 2005) that feature strong legal enforcement. In contrast, research that finds unfavorable motivations and consequences of R&D capitalization is done in countries with weak legal environments, such as Italy or France (Markarian et al, 2008;Cazavan-Jeny & Jeanjean, 2006;Cazavan-Jeny et al, 2011).…”
Section: Auditors' Fee Reaction To Clients' Randd Capitalization Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It follows that the pricing multiplier on 13 We thank the reviewer for highlighting this intuition. 14 In reporting regimes where a choice between capitalizing and expensing R&D is allowed such as for firms traded on the Australian exchange (Ahmed and Falk (2006)) and firms following IFRS 38, this framework can be extended to examine the value relevance of capitalization versus expensing.…”
Section: Valuation Of Randd Expenditures For Profit and Loss Firmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some settings, capitalizing R&D has been found to be informative (e.g. Ahmed & Falk, 2006 under Australian generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP); Oswald & Zarowin, 2007 under UK GAAP). In other settings, research has found evidence that the discretion involved in R&D capitalization can be used for opportunistic earnings management, resulting in capitalization being uninformative (Cazavan-Jeny & Jeanjean, 2006;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%