2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07985.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The very bright SCUBA galaxy count: looking for SCUBA galaxies with the Mexican hat wavelet

Abstract: We present the results of a search for bright high-redshift galaxies in two large Submillimetre Common-User Bolometer Array (SCUBA) scan-maps of Galactic regions. A Mexican hat wavelet technique was used to locate point sources in these maps, which suffer high foreground contamination as well as typical scan-map noise signatures. A catalogue of point-source objects was selected and observed again in the submillimetre continuum, and in HCO + (3 → 2) at zero redshift to rule out Galactic sources. No extragalacti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scuba-2 850µm data from Casey et al (2013) and Chen et al (2013b) are also plotted, the latter including the lens field work of Chen et al (2013a). The Cowie et al (2002) results do not quote uncertainties and the Barnard et al (2004) results represent upper limits on number counts at very high flux densities, covering larger areas than the nominal Scuba survey. The work of Blain et al (1999), Smail et al (2002), Cowie et al (2002), Knudsen et al (2008) and Chen et al (2013a) used gravitational lensing in cluster fields to survey flux densities <1 mJy.…”
Section: Number Countsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Scuba-2 850µm data from Casey et al (2013) and Chen et al (2013b) are also plotted, the latter including the lens field work of Chen et al (2013a). The Cowie et al (2002) results do not quote uncertainties and the Barnard et al (2004) results represent upper limits on number counts at very high flux densities, covering larger areas than the nominal Scuba survey. The work of Blain et al (1999), Smail et al (2002), Cowie et al (2002), Knudsen et al (2008) and Chen et al (2013a) used gravitational lensing in cluster fields to survey flux densities <1 mJy.…”
Section: Number Countsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 12 illustrates both 850-870µm number counts (from Scuba, Laboca, Scuba-2, and ALMA Blain et al, 1999;Scott et al, 2002;Chapman et al, 2002;Cowie et al, 2002;Borys et al, 2003;Webb et al, 2003;Barnard et al, 2004;Coppin et al, 2006;Scott et al, 2006;Knudsen et al, 2008;Beelen et al, 2008;Weiß et al, 2009a;Karim et al, 2013;Casey et al, 2013;Chen et al, 2013a) and 450-500µm (from Scuba, Herschel and Scuba-2 Smail et al, 2002;Oliver et al, 2010;Clements et al, 2010;Béthermin et al, 2012b;Geach et al, 2013;Casey et al, 2013;Chen et al, 2013a). Figure 13 illustrates other infrared and submillimeter number counts in the literature in direct units, from 70µm Béthermin et al, 2010a;Berta et al, 2011), 100µm (Héraudeau et al, 2004;Rodighiero & Franceschini, 2004;Kawara et al, 2004;Berta et al, 2011;Magnelli et al, 2013b), 160µm Kawara et al, 2004;Béthermin et al, 2010a;Berta et al, 2011;Magnelli et al, 2013b), 250µm and 350µm Chen+13 (850) Casey+13 (850 Figure 12: Differential submillimeter number counts at 850µm/870µm (left) and 450-500 µm (right).…”
Section: Number Countsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Candidate sources are identified by finding peaks after a Mexican Hat Wavelet type convolution (MHW, hereafter; see, e.g., Barnard et al 2004) is applied to all five SPIRE/PACS maps. Initial candidate lists from 70, 160 and 250 μm are then found and fluxes at all three bands extracted by fitting a compact Gaussian profile to the source.…”
Section: Source and Flux Extraction In The Spire/pacs Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we would like to point out that the MHW has been used for the detection of objects in X-ray images [22,23] and, more recently, in SCUBA [6,53] and Boomerang data [21].…”
Section: The Mexican Hat Waveletmentioning
confidence: 99%