The viability of enforcement mechanisms under money laundering and anti‐terrorism offences in Malaysia

Abstract

Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to give a better insight to the legal society, practitioners and legislators of the working mechanisms of money laundering activities, as well as the functionalities of the Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-terrorism Financing Act 2003 (AMLATFA) in Malaysia, in curbing money laundering and terrorism funding activities. At the same time, the paper provides an overview on the applicability and practicability of the enforcement mechanisms in Malaysia by exploring legislations from different jurisdictions that are more developed. Design/methodology/approach -The paper achieves this by having a cross-sectional analysis onto the legislation in Malaysia such as AMLATFA and also similar legislations found in countries such as the UK. A complete insight is further gained by having interviews with experts in the judiciary, Bank Negara, as well as the experts from the Attorney General's Chamber in Malaysia regarding their insight into the subject matter. Last but not least, the authors also surveyed into the different points of view from journal articles in Malaysia and globally. Findings -Malaysia has a legal framework for curbing money laundering but the current AMLATFA provisions are considered to have failed to be effectively enforced. A more comprehensive, specific and well elaborated legal framework will have to be laid down in order to create a better platform for the prosecutors to bring a good case against these money launderers. Practical implications -This paper will give a deeper insight to the legal society of the capability of AMLATFA and the lack of it, in curbing money laundering in Malaysia and, at the same time, creating awareness among policy makers of the difficulties faced by the enforcement bureaus in prosecuting these money launderers due to the lacunas in the current law. Originality/value -This paper could be useful source of information for practitioners, academics, policymakers and students and a guide for any possible future amendments to the current insufficiency.

Ethical Finance Dimension of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Case Study of Indian SOEs

“…Environmental ethics is a key concern for leaders in forefront. Spending adequately to right cause is an essentiality studies from the law perspectives focus more on the relevant legislations and statutes and their applicability within the specific legislative environment (Dhillon, Rusniah, & Aspalela, 2013). Studies from the accounting and finance perspective, on the other hand, cater on the awareness of money laundering risk and prevention measures (Ghani, Omar, & Yusuf, 2013).…”

The Preliminary Evidence Of The Exploitation Of Non-Profit Organisations For Terrorist Financing

“…The FATF 40 Recommendations urges all countries to establish mechanisms which allow financial investigators to obtain and share information among the law enforcement agencies. Also, it was further suggested that there must be mechanisms for investigators to use their powers to assist foreign financial investigations and also be allowed to establish and utilize joint investigative teams with law enforcement in other countries (Dhillon, et. al, 2013).…”

“Trust me; I’m your lawyer”: Lawyers’ Reporting Duty under AML/ATF Law in Malaysia

“…Any crime that generates significant profit through extortion, drug trafficking, arms smuggling and some white collar crime may create a "need" for money laundering (FATF, 2001). Similarly, recent writers have conceptualized money laundering either as a process (Rahman, 2013;Graycar and Grabosky, 1996;Unger, 2013). Simser (2013) suggests that money laundering is to clean 'dirty money" derived from criminal activities to disguise the origin of such money and to make them appear to have come from a legitimate source.…”