1987
DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x00047403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The virtues of chaos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings in EEG signals and other analogous facts in cardiology led some authors to claim that chaos was an indicator of healthy flexibility and pathology was associated with a loss of this chaotic flexibility (Pool, 1989). Garfinkel (1987) explained that a strictly periodic physiological behaviour could be very destructive. In analogy to the way a group of soldiers breaks step before crossing a bridge to avoid resonance and collapse, the brain and the body exhibit a mode of "active desynchronization" without leaving nothing to chance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…These findings in EEG signals and other analogous facts in cardiology led some authors to claim that chaos was an indicator of healthy flexibility and pathology was associated with a loss of this chaotic flexibility (Pool, 1989). Garfinkel (1987) explained that a strictly periodic physiological behaviour could be very destructive. In analogy to the way a group of soldiers breaks step before crossing a bridge to avoid resonance and collapse, the brain and the body exhibit a mode of "active desynchronization" without leaving nothing to chance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Chaos is indistinguishable from random noise in appearance and in statistical properties but it is deterministic and not stochastic. Chaos theory has following attributes: (i) deterministic systems can display behavior that appears random, and (ii) chaos in these systems is controlled, bounded, and has a small number (4-7) of independent contributors, and has definite qualitative form [32]. Chaotic systems are not as predictable as the cause-and-effect based linear system.…”
Section: Chaos Theory For the Emergence Of Subjective Experiences Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our working definition of self is the subjective experience of subject, "which can operate in three levels hierarchically or in parallel depending of various conditions: (i) proto, bodily, or physical self is related to sensory processing in sensory cortical and subcortical activations, (ii) core, minimal, or mental self is related to self-referential processing in cortical midline structures via deactivation, and (iii) autobiographical, emotional, spatial, verbal, narrative, or spiritual self is related to higher order processing in lateral (ventrolateral PFC: VLPFC, dorsolateral PFC: DLPFC) cortical activations [62,63]. Cortical midline structures (CMS) include MOFC (medial orbital prefrontal cortex: Brodman areas or BA 11,12), VMPFC (ventromedial prefrontal cortex: BA 10, 11), PACC (pre-and subgenual anterior cingulate cortex: BA 24,25,32), SACC (supragenual anterior cingulate cortex: BA 24, 32), DMPFC (dorsomedial prefrontal cortex: BA 9), MPC (medial parietal cortex: BA 7, 31), PCC (posterior cingulate cortex: BA 23), and RSC (retrosplenial cortex: BA 26,29,30) [63]. This first-person-perspective is consistent with [59] that reported involvement of medial cortical and parietal areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%