2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops 2013
DOI: 10.1109/iccvw.2013.20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Visual Object Tracking VOT2013 Challenge Results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
264
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 265 publications
(302 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
264
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some researchers have also attempted to use neural networks for tracking within the traditional online training framework [26,27,34,37,35,30,39,7,24,16], showing state-of-the-art results [30,7,21]. Unfortunately, neural networks are very slow to train, and if online training is required, then the resulting tracker will be very slow at test time.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Some researchers have also attempted to use neural networks for tracking within the traditional online training framework [26,27,34,37,35,30,39,7,24,16], showing state-of-the-art results [30,7,21]. Unfortunately, neural networks are very slow to train, and if online training is required, then the resulting tracker will be very slow at test time.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, neural networks are very slow to train, and if online training is required, then the resulting tracker will be very slow at test time. Such trackers range from 0.8 fps [26] to 15 fps [37], with the top performing neural-network trackers running at 1 fps on a GPU [30,7,21]. Hence, these trackers are not usable for most practical applications.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations