2019
DOI: 10.17582/journal.pjz/2019.51.2.737.745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Vocalizations and Hearing Sensitivity of an Explosive-Breeding Tropical Toad from Southern China: A Test of the Matched Filter Hypothesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that female and male T. scripta elegans have a similar range of sensitivities (0.2–0.9 kHz), whereas the ABR threshold of females was significantly lower than that in males. These results provide convincing evidence that sexually dimorphic hearing sensitivity has emerged in turtles, and that the hearing of females is more sensitive than that of males, which is consistent with previous findings for frogs and toads (Wang et al 2016, 2019; Yang et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found that female and male T. scripta elegans have a similar range of sensitivities (0.2–0.9 kHz), whereas the ABR threshold of females was significantly lower than that in males. These results provide convincing evidence that sexually dimorphic hearing sensitivity has emerged in turtles, and that the hearing of females is more sensitive than that of males, which is consistent with previous findings for frogs and toads (Wang et al 2016, 2019; Yang et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…At present, sexual selection (Lovich and Gibbons 1992; Willemsen and Hailey 2003), fecundity effort (Kupfer 2009; Olsson et al 2010), and niche divergence (Thom et al 2010) are the three major hypotheses that have been proposed to explain the evolution and maintenance of sexual size dimorphism (SSD). Although most studies on sexual dimorphism have concentrated on body size or shape, sexually dimorphic hearing sensitivity has also been reported in some species of amphibians (Narins and Capranica 1976; Wang et al 2016, 2019; Yang et al 2018). Remarkably, such sexually dimorphic hearing sensitivity may primarily result from sexual dimorphism of the auditory organs (particularly tympanic membranes) and their physical properties (Dijk et al 2002; Feng et al 2006; Shen et al 2011; Liu et al 2014; Wang et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vocalization was important character for identification which had been studied in Toad (Wang et al 2019) and Liocichla (Kong et al 2020). This research aimed to study the bioacoustics character and study the inbreeding coefficient of Pelung chicken.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Auditory brainstem response (ABR) measurement is a noninvasive and rapid method to measure hearing sensitivity; its use has been validated for frogs [26, 27], toads [28], and reptiles [18, 29]. Our aim was to demonstrate that aging is accompanied by changes in turtle hearing sensitivity by measuring ABR, to assess ontogenetic changes in post-hatchling-to-reproductive T. scripta elegans adults.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%