2015
DOI: 10.1177/1468794114567496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The voices heard and the voices silenced: recruitment processes in qualitative interview studies

Abstract: Background Recruiting busy health care providers into research can be challenging. Yet, the success of a research project can hinge on recruitment response rates. This article uses a case study to demonstrate how qualitative researchers creatively readjusted their methods when standard methods were not yielding enough recruitment response with the aim of supporting other researchers with their recruitment. Methods Case Example-Interest was expressed but response rates were low among nurses and health care aide… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
99
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
99
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the above, it seems plausible to argue that the research society needs to reflect upon implicit authority that may be built into healthcare organizations and affects who will be invited to take part in research and who will not. The lack of recognition regarding recruitment in qualitative studies is noticeable as it is often more challenging than expected and more significant than generally acknowledged (Kristensen & Ravn, 2015). One consideration is the need for careful reporting regarding how the selection process is conducted in qualitative studies involving individuals with severe and persistent mental illness such as schizophrenia and other psychotic conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the above, it seems plausible to argue that the research society needs to reflect upon implicit authority that may be built into healthcare organizations and affects who will be invited to take part in research and who will not. The lack of recognition regarding recruitment in qualitative studies is noticeable as it is often more challenging than expected and more significant than generally acknowledged (Kristensen & Ravn, 2015). One consideration is the need for careful reporting regarding how the selection process is conducted in qualitative studies involving individuals with severe and persistent mental illness such as schizophrenia and other psychotic conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is also important to note that (as alluded to above) a number of activities that may serve to establish the relevance of membership categories may have been performed prior to the actual occasion on which the recordings were produced, including recruitment and informed consentrelated activities (see, e.g., Kristensen and Ravn, 2015;McCormack et al, 2013). While our lack of recorded access to these activities may thus limit our ability to pinpoint the precise moments in the research process at which particular categories first become relevant, our data nonetheless enable us to consider some ways in which they are (re)established in the talk that immediately precedes the onset of interview and focus group interactions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Was it a peer norm in the class? Others have identified a similar issue when trying to recruit men for studies on friendship (Butera, 2006) and paid domestic labour (Kristensen & Ravn, 2015), and have suggested that gendered identities may be at play, when men may perceive the research agenda as threatening where there is a female researcher but have also positioned the research topic as feminine.…”
Section: Researcher Positioningmentioning
confidence: 99%