1917
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1917.sp001785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The volume of the dead space in breathing and the mixing of gases in the lungs of man

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
5

Year Published

1954
1954
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
33
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of a method to sample multiple within-breath samples of CO 2 [2] demonstrated modest variability in partial pressures within an exhaled breath in normal subjects, leading to the recognition that a gas sample captured within a breath would not necessarily reflect the true mean alveolar gas composition. While that effect was minor in normal subjects, it became a substantial source of variability in patients with significant underlying lung disease.…”
Section: Bohr Dead Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of a method to sample multiple within-breath samples of CO 2 [2] demonstrated modest variability in partial pressures within an exhaled breath in normal subjects, leading to the recognition that a gas sample captured within a breath would not necessarily reflect the true mean alveolar gas composition. While that effect was minor in normal subjects, it became a substantial source of variability in patients with significant underlying lung disease.…”
Section: Bohr Dead Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that the 'physiological' dead space, calculated from the alveolar gas tensions, when these are measured directly, increases considerably during exercise. However, Krogh & Lindhard (1913a, 1917 measured it by an independent method and found that it changed very little. The calculated alveolar gas tensions which resulted from their values for the dead space were practically the same as those prevailing during rest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Krogh & Lindhard (1917) criticized the Haldane-Priestley method because of the uncertainties underlying the assumption that the mean of the two samples was the mean for the alveolar air. DuBois, Britt & Fenn (1952) have recently investigated this point.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 1917, August Krogh and Johannes Lindhard (Krogh and Lindhard, 1917) published a paper where they speculated that pulmonary perfusion through each lung lobe should be in proportion to its ventilation. The modern era of understanding ventilation-perfusion relationships began Introduction 3 compliance in the lung.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%