2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2008.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The vulnerability context of a savanna area in Mozambique: household drought coping strategies and responses to economic change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
96
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
96
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the nested, teleconnected nature of vulnerability, system responses have the potential to alleviate or exacerbate the conditions that influence its own vulnerability via feedback loops (Kates et al, 2010;Eakin et al, 2009;Eriksen & Silva, 2009;Eakin & Luers, Figure 2. Conceptual framework (primarily based on Westerhoff & Smit, 2009).…”
Section: Vulnerability Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the nested, teleconnected nature of vulnerability, system responses have the potential to alleviate or exacerbate the conditions that influence its own vulnerability via feedback loops (Kates et al, 2010;Eakin et al, 2009;Eriksen & Silva, 2009;Eakin & Luers, Figure 2. Conceptual framework (primarily based on Westerhoff & Smit, 2009).…”
Section: Vulnerability Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bunce et al (2010) show how national and regional development and conservation policies undermine the resilience of poor coastal communities in East Africa. Likewise Eriksen and Silva (2009) (see also Silva et al, 2010) show how shifts to commercial agriculture, land privatization and market integration -all associated with conventional rural development and pathways out of poverty -can weaken the ability of smallholder farmers to respond to drought. Barnett (2008) shows that, in the South Pacific, dependence on development aid militates against autonomous anticipatory action and decreases adaptive capacity by undermining the legitimacy of government action, and ultimately makes sustainable adaptation (or sustainable development) much less likely.…”
Section: Clarifying Relationships Between Adaptation and Poverty Redumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chickens were the most common source of extra income. We did not assess the revenues from those other activities, and smallholder farmers access food in a variety of ways (Ellis 2000;Eriksen and Silva 2009;Hahn et al 2009). The other activities were more important for livelihood support in Zembe than in Dombe.…”
Section: Land and Labour Productivities At Farm Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%