1986
DOI: 10.1016/s0109-5641(86)80034-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The wear of a posterior composite in an artificial mouth: a clinical correlation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
99
1
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
99
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…21 An average of between 240 000 and 250 000 mastication simulator cycles conforms with 1 year of in vivo wear. 22 The difference between using no lateral movements and 0.7 mm lateral movements led to 8 times more wear. 23 A force of 50 N was used as this is the average force found between the antagonists orally.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…21 An average of between 240 000 and 250 000 mastication simulator cycles conforms with 1 year of in vivo wear. 22 The difference between using no lateral movements and 0.7 mm lateral movements led to 8 times more wear. 23 A force of 50 N was used as this is the average force found between the antagonists orally.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The parameters chosen for the mastication simulator were a loading force of 50 N with 250 000 cycles, vertical speed of 30 mm/second, and a lateral movement of 0.7 mm from forward to backward. [21][22][23] The number of cycles was sufficient to cause changes in the antagonist. 21 An average of between 240 000 and 250 000 mastication simulator cycles conforms with 1 year of in vivo wear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results obtained after 240,000 to 250,000 'masticatory' cycles in a chewing simulator corresponded to the results obtained after one year of clinical service. 23,24 Thus the number of cycles used in the present study could be proportioned to 5 years of service. A force of 49 N was applied during the aging test, thus reflecting normal occlusion and chewing forces for posterior teeth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implants were subjected to 10 million loading cycles. This aimed to simulate 10-40 years of loading in vivo, depending on the underlying data for extrapolation suggesting 240,000 up to 1,000,000 chewing contacts per year [17][18][19][20]. A load of 98 N (10 kg) was applied on the highest point to the horizontal of the angulated steel jig.…”
Section: Dynamic Loading Test ("Mechanical Treatment")mentioning
confidence: 99%