2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.11.084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Weight of Pharmacokinetic Parameters for Mycophenolic Acid in Prediction of Rejection Outcome: The Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is now well-established that CSA decreases MPA exposure by inhibiting the enterohepatic recirculation of the drug (13,14), and although we are unaware of any additional effects of antiretroviral medications on MMF pharmacokinetics, it may be that adequate MPA exposure is particularly critical in preventing AR in HIVϩ recipients, especially given the frequent presence of other high-risk factors, such as AA ethnicity. Moreover, the absence of clear support in the literature for a substantial clinical benefit of therapeutic drug monitoring of MPA (15), along with the demonstration that MPA trough values are more variable and less predictive for the risk of AR than is the area under the curve and that predose concentrations poorly correlate with area under the curve (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20), still do not negate the possibility that monitoring of MPA levels played a contributory role in preventing AR in our patients. Along these lines, several investigators have established trough level cutoffs below which the incidence of AR was felt to be significantly increased in adult renal transplant recipients on CSA in the early posttransplant period, ranging from 0.8 to 1.3 mg/L (17)(18)(19)21).…”
Section: Compared Outcomes In 38mentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is now well-established that CSA decreases MPA exposure by inhibiting the enterohepatic recirculation of the drug (13,14), and although we are unaware of any additional effects of antiretroviral medications on MMF pharmacokinetics, it may be that adequate MPA exposure is particularly critical in preventing AR in HIVϩ recipients, especially given the frequent presence of other high-risk factors, such as AA ethnicity. Moreover, the absence of clear support in the literature for a substantial clinical benefit of therapeutic drug monitoring of MPA (15), along with the demonstration that MPA trough values are more variable and less predictive for the risk of AR than is the area under the curve and that predose concentrations poorly correlate with area under the curve (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20), still do not negate the possibility that monitoring of MPA levels played a contributory role in preventing AR in our patients. Along these lines, several investigators have established trough level cutoffs below which the incidence of AR was felt to be significantly increased in adult renal transplant recipients on CSA in the early posttransplant period, ranging from 0.8 to 1.3 mg/L (17)(18)(19)21).…”
Section: Compared Outcomes In 38mentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Moreover, the absence of clear support in the literature for a substantial clinical benefit of therapeutic drug monitoring of MPA (15), along with the demonstration that MPA trough values are more variable and less predictive for the risk of AR than is the area under the curve and that predose concentrations poorly correlate with area under the curve (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20), still do not negate the possibility that monitoring of MPA levels played a contributory role in preventing AR in our patients. Along these lines, several investigators have established trough level cutoffs below which the incidence of AR was felt to be significantly increased in adult renal transplant recipients on CSA in the early posttransplant period, ranging from 0.8 to 1.3 mg/L (17)(18)(19)21). Without monitoring, most of our patients (and perhaps many of those in the prior studies mentioned) would have carried MPA levels below this threshold beyond the first posttransplant month, presumably increasing their risk for AR.…”
Section: Compared Outcomes In 38mentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Many retrospective studies found significant relationships between MPA AUC 0-12 h and BPAR or side effects in various types of populations [31][32][33][34][35], but the few prospective studies lead to diverging conclusions. The FDCC study found no statistically significant differences in outcome between the fixed-dose group and the dose-adjusted group [14], whereas the Apomygre trial did [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have demonstrated that MPA AUC may predict the risk of acute rejection and toxicity; however, single‐point sampling at particular trough levels has shown poor correlation with the risk of acute rejection and toxicity . The wide variability and clear concentration–effect relationship are thought to be the most compelling arguments favouring therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for MPA, and individualization of MMF dose using TDM based on the MPA AUC .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%