2014
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2014/12/010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Weyl tensor correlator in cosmological spacetimes

Abstract: We give a general expression for the Weyl tensor two-point function in a general Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker spacetime. We work in reduced phase space for the perturbations, i. e., quantize only the dynamical degrees of freedom without adding any gauge-fixing term. The general formula is illustrated by a calculation in slow-roll single-field inflation to first order in the slow-roll parameters and δ, and the result is shown to have the correct de Sitter limit as , δ → 0. Furthermore, it is seen that th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as already pointed out, thanks to the mathematical structure of the formulation we are using, inspired by the ambient space approach, it can be checked quite easily that the aforementioned break down in the normalization factor is because of a degeneracy for L = 0 mode reflecting the gauge-like symmetry (2). This point explicitly reveals that, quite contrary to the authors claim in [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46], such a construction in the STT gauge conditions (L ≥ 2), by ignoring the L = 0 mode and consequently the gauge-like symmetry (2) reflected by it, does not transform correctly under the whole symmetries of the classical theory, and therefore, even obtaining an infrared free graviton twopoint function in this way is not physically significant since it is not covariant anyway. To see other criticism to this method, one can refer to [51][52][53][54][55].…”
Section: Graviton Two-point Functionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, as already pointed out, thanks to the mathematical structure of the formulation we are using, inspired by the ambient space approach, it can be checked quite easily that the aforementioned break down in the normalization factor is because of a degeneracy for L = 0 mode reflecting the gauge-like symmetry (2). This point explicitly reveals that, quite contrary to the authors claim in [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46], such a construction in the STT gauge conditions (L ≥ 2), by ignoring the L = 0 mode and consequently the gauge-like symmetry (2) reflected by it, does not transform correctly under the whole symmetries of the classical theory, and therefore, even obtaining an infrared free graviton twopoint function in this way is not physically significant since it is not covariant anyway. To see other criticism to this method, one can refer to [51][52][53][54][55].…”
Section: Graviton Two-point Functionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…|c Llm | 2 < ∞ , (38) in which E 2 g 2 µν stands for the projection tensor associated with the invariant subspace V 2 /V g2 , denoted by the cindependent part in (19). Again, the zero mode (L = 0) does not contribute to the physical space of solutions because if it was included, the set of physical modes would be transformed into modes of negative frequency violating unitarity.…”
Section: B Gupta-bleuler Tripletsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One consequence is that gravitons do not possess a fully de Sitter invariant vacuum state, just like the massless, minimally coupled scalar [83], whose plane wave mode functions are identical to those of dynamical gravitons [84]. There has been a long and confusing debate about this [52][53][54][55][56][57]. All agree that the graviton mode functions approach a constant at late times (that is what causes the tensor power spectrum) and that this freezing-in endows the completely gauge fixed graviton propagator with a de Sitter-breaking time dependence which takes the form of a linearized gauge transformation.…”
Section: Ir Cleansed Hubble Parameter and Field Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physicists accept that the freezing in of scalars can mediate effects because the value of a scalar field is observable; for example, the expectation value of the Higgs field determines masses in the Standard Model. However, physicists are conditioned to dismiss nonzero constant values of the graviton field as gauge artifacts which could be eliminated by an appropriate choice of coordinates [52][53][54][55][56][57].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the very beginning of this scientific dispute, a firm reasoning in favor of covariant quantization of the graviton field in the natural dS vacuum state (the Bunch-Davies vacuum) was put forward in Ref. [4], and during recent three decades, it has been dynamically subject to scrutiny in a number of works (see, for instance, [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]). Let us make the idea lying behind of this reasoning explicit, using the so-called conformal (global) coordinates, x = (x 0 = H −1 tan ρ, (H cos ρ) −1 u), ρ ∈] −π 2 , π 2 [, u ∈ S 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%