2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-004-1097-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Wilson Loop Observables of Chern-Simons Theory on ℝ3 in Axial Gauge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
54
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is pretty clear that such a partial gauge fixing will lead to a version of the vertex model, although it may be tricky to compute the precise vertex weights. The necessary computations are likely to be somewhat similar to those involved in studying Chern-Simons theory in an ordinary axial gauge -for example, see [52,53] -or in a certain almost axial gauge [54]. Somewhat analogous is the use of a complex version of axial gauge to derive the Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov equations [55].…”
Section: Davide Gaiotto and Edward Wittenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is pretty clear that such a partial gauge fixing will lead to a version of the vertex model, although it may be tricky to compute the precise vertex weights. The necessary computations are likely to be somewhat similar to those involved in studying Chern-Simons theory in an ordinary axial gauge -for example, see [52,53] -or in a certain almost axial gauge [54]. Somewhat analogous is the use of a complex version of axial gauge to derive the Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov equations [55].…”
Section: Davide Gaiotto and Edward Wittenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same results were obtained in [60] in the framework of white noise calculus. These result have been extended to the case where G is not abelian and M = R 3 in [29,45] by means of white noise analysis (see also [14] for a detailed exposition of this topic). The case M = S 1 × S 2 has been recently handled in [46].…”
Section: The Chern-simons Modelmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is also a necessary preparation for the non-Abelian case, for it turns out that the four lemmas which are used in the proof of Theorem 1 also play a role in the treatment of the non-Abelian case, cf. [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Of course, G ¼ Uð1Þ is Abelian but as we will show in a subsequent paper (cf. [16]), it is also possible to define and to compute the WLOs explicitly within our approach if the group G is non-Abelian.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%