IEEE INFOCOM '99. Conference on Computer Communications. Proceedings. Eighteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer A 1999
DOI: 10.1109/infcom.1999.752179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The window distribution of idealized TCP congestion avoidance with variable packet loss

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[25] showed that throughput decreases faster (roughly proportional to 1/p) at higher values of p. All these papers assume constant round-trip times. Misra and Ott [21] incorporated state-dependent packet loss probabilities into their model and studied the stationary distribution of the congestion window.…”
Section: Probabilistic Analysis Of Tcp Congestion Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25] showed that throughput decreases faster (roughly proportional to 1/p) at higher values of p. All these papers assume constant round-trip times. Misra and Ott [21] incorporated state-dependent packet loss probabilities into their model and studied the stationary distribution of the congestion window.…”
Section: Probabilistic Analysis Of Tcp Congestion Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To derive the probability distribution (and hence, other statistics such as the variance) of the congestion window of a generalized TCP flow (for = 1 :0), we modified the approach described in [13], which presented an analyticalcum-numerical technique to compute the TCP window distribution when congestion was signaled via packets dropped with a state-dependent probability. A purely analytical computation of the window distribution of an idealized TCP flow subject to packet drops with a constant drop probability was presented in [12].…”
Section: A Motivation and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 As in [13], our formulation can also be used when different flows have marking probabilities that are scalar multiples of each other, i.e., f i mark (Q) = i f mark (Q) where i are arbitrary constants. We do not explore this scenario in this paper.…”
Section: A Characterizing the Fixed Pointmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations