The working class in the Australian mainstream media

Abstract

The Australian mainstream media is dominated by middle-class voices, and this shapes the way working-class people are framed within the media. Working-class people have tended to be represented as responsible for their poverty, or ridiculed for their lack of sophistication. But could very small shifts be occurring, as some outlets acknowledge the impact of neo-liberalism on working-class people and point to some of the structural causes of inequality? This article looks at some examples of working-class representation in Australian newspapers, television news and current affairs programs, and considers the ways in which working-class people are presented. The article also asks whether the Australian mainstream media provides a place for working-class voices?

An Analysis of the Characteristics and Trends of China’s Mainstream Media Integration

“…A key aspect of mobile Internet development has been the promotion of short video as an important means of transmitting information and obtaining information. It is necessary to bolster the production of video content by producing more short videos, microfilms, public service advertisements, poster pictures, audio news, and other products, and to increase the production of works that are loved by the masses and popular on the screen (Attfield, 2020). There were 888 million short video users in my country as of June 2021, representing 87.8% of the total number of internet users (Yang, Z.K., 2021).…”

“…Several core functions are inherent to the new mainstream media, including public opinion guidance, information governance, and public service, both on the domestic and international fronts (Attfield, 2020). Nowadays, most mainstream media channels have established accounts on leading social media platforms that are dominated by social capital.…”

What comes after fields, capitals, habitus? Suggestions for future cultural consumption research in Australia

“…Colleagues and I have argued that class needs to be brought into public discussions of inequality, especially because these discussions are dominated by the use of deliberately distorted scapegoating figures that obfuscate the systemic nature of inequality and the endemic nature of poverty (Gerrard & Threadgold, 2022). Inequality is figured, represented and distorted (Threadgold, 2020a) in ways that speak for a small, privileged cohort of society, especially the legacy media that are so dominated by middle-class voices (Attfield, 2020). For instance, I have analysed the figures of hipsters and bogans (Threadgold, 2018b) in terms of how they represent class, where the figure of the hipster resonates more with the tastes and morals of middle-class media workers, and so is reported on much more playfully than the more straightforward, symbolically violent invocations of the bogan.…”