karyn l. lai
LEARNING FROM THE CONFUCIANS: LEARNING FROM THE PASTA distinguishing characteristic of Confucianism is its emphasis on learning as a key element in moral self-cultivation. The early Confucians, Confucius (551-479 BCE), Mencius (385?-12? BCE), and Xunzi ( ) (310?-219? BCE), discussed learning in significant detail. The texts associated with these figures attend to different ways of learning for self-development. They emphasized xue ( ), which relates to the gathering of information and knowledge, especially about human conduct and behavior. One comes by such information through listening (wen) ( ) and watching ( jian) ( ) (e.g., Analects 2:18 1 ), and through reading classical texts such as the Classic of Odes (Shijing) () and the Record of Rites (Liji) ( ). In addition to xue, the early Confucian texts also emphasize the place of reflection (si) ( ) (e.g., Analects 2:15, at 79) in the cultivation of the self.There is an important distinction between these two primary aspects of learning, xue and si. While xue relates to observing, gathering, and collating of details of past and current practices and beliefs, si is reflective, requiring a person to stand back, as it were, from received information. 2 In this article, I demonstrate that early Confucian philosophy understands xue and si as integrated parts of the cultivation process. Both are important right through a person's development: Learning informs reflection, and reflection guides further learning (Analects 2:15, at 79; 15:31, at 190). In this discussion, I focus primarily on the Analects, while drawing from or commenting on the Mencius and Xunzi where appropriate.An important issue in discussions of Confucian self-cultivation is the role of the past, that is, of ancient wisdoms, traditions, and practices, in Confucian thinking. Appealing to the past seems to be a characteristic feature of the Confucian tradition, one that opponents of Confucian thought (including the Mohists, Legalists, and Daoists) were keen to reject. In briefly examining some of their arguments, I seek to demonstrate that these other thinkers made an incorrect assumption about the Confucians' use of the past. While the Confucians appealed to the