2001
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.282117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The World Price of Earnings Opacity

Abstract: We analyze the financial statements of 58,653 firm-years from 34 countries for the period 1985-1998 to construct a panel data set measuring three dimensions of reported accounting earnings for each countryearnings aggressiveness, loss avoidance, and earnings smoothing. We hypothesize that these three dimensions are associated with uninformative or opaque earnings, and so we combine these three measures to obtain an overall earnings opacity time-series measure per country. We then explore whether our three meas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
140
0
22

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
5
140
0
22
Order By: Relevance
“…The accounting standards for Singapore and Malaysia are based on International Accounting Standards, which are less stringent than US GAAP. Bhattacharya et al (2003) compare earnings management across countries in terms of increasing earnings, negative earnings avoidance and earnings smoothing. From their data, Singapore and Malaysia are similar in terms of "earnings opacity" but different from countries that have been used in prior research (US, UK and Australia).…”
Section: (2) Institutional Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accounting standards for Singapore and Malaysia are based on International Accounting Standards, which are less stringent than US GAAP. Bhattacharya et al (2003) compare earnings management across countries in terms of increasing earnings, negative earnings avoidance and earnings smoothing. From their data, Singapore and Malaysia are similar in terms of "earnings opacity" but different from countries that have been used in prior research (US, UK and Australia).…”
Section: (2) Institutional Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing literature does not seem to provide clear indication with regard to this assumption. Some studies find that the market is able to properly assess the quality of earnings (Bhattacharya et al, 2003;Desai et al, 2006;Francis et al, 2005a;Gaio and Raposo, 2011;Hennes et al, 2008). Other studies suggest that the market fails to properly assess the quality of earnings in a timely manner (Chan et al, 2006;Collins and Hribar, 2000;Richardson, 2003;Sloan, 1996;Xie, 2001).…”
Section: Prior Literature and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Ball et al (2000) classified seven countries based on legal tradition into code law and common law countries. Bhattacharya et al (2003) classified thirty-four countries based on characteristics of financial accounting variables of firms in each country. Saudagaran and Diga (1997) used disclosure scores for forty-one countries.…”
Section: Accounting Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%