2016 IEEE PELS Workshop on Emerging Technologies: Wireless Power Transfer (WoW) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/wow.2016.7772079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The WPT dilemma — High K or high Q?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the available design options are limited by both power and space requirements. After reduction of the potential losses, the efficiency of the power transfer can be improved by three design parameters, which ultimately affect the product kQ [79], [80]. As shown in (9), these parameters include the 2 mutual inductance M or coupling coefficient k, the self-inductance of the coils L and the frequency ω.…”
Section: Coil Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the available design options are limited by both power and space requirements. After reduction of the potential losses, the efficiency of the power transfer can be improved by three design parameters, which ultimately affect the product kQ [79], [80]. As shown in (9), these parameters include the 2 mutual inductance M or coupling coefficient k, the self-inductance of the coils L and the frequency ω.…”
Section: Coil Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coupling can be maximised by using equally sized coils as shown in Figure 6. Having equally sized coils also reduces eddy currents induced in the vehicle chassis and leakage magnetic field surrounding the coils [80]. Reducing the size of the receiving coil is convenient, as it would be easier to incorporate in the vehicle.…”
Section: Coil Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research of Miller et al [30] pointed out the way to improve efficiency and lower cost of IPT systems is to maximise the coupling coefficient of coils, rather than quality factor Q . As a result, the coupling coefficient of the LCT, denoted by k in this paper, is selected as the optimisation objective.…”
Section: Lct Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of equal and same size coils in an EV application Eddy currents to the vehicle chassis are decreased, as is magnetic field permeability surrounding the coil field. 167 When there is a coil of receiver volume size is reduced, it is more suited and easy to install in the car. When cars are fitted with a secondary side circuit, there is a greater benefit in terms of size and weight reduction.…”
Section: Coil Designmentioning
confidence: 99%