2008
DOI: 10.1134/s1063772908070020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The X-ray variability of Mrk 421

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…a moderate correlation between the flux and b. This finding is compatible with earlier findings (Fidelis & Iakubovskyi 2008). The (anti)correlation between a and the flux is significant: the non-directional chance probability of the derived correlation coefficient for the null-hypothesis is p < 10 −4 for the RXTE/ PCA data as well as for the Swift/XRT data.…”
Section: Veritas (2008)supporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…a moderate correlation between the flux and b. This finding is compatible with earlier findings (Fidelis & Iakubovskyi 2008). The (anti)correlation between a and the flux is significant: the non-directional chance probability of the derived correlation coefficient for the null-hypothesis is p < 10 −4 for the RXTE/ PCA data as well as for the Swift/XRT data.…”
Section: Veritas (2008)supporting
confidence: 91%
“…The Lorentz factors of the X-ray emitting electrons should thus be 1.5 order of magnitudes (factor ∼30) larger than the Lorentz factors of the optically emitting electrons. If the X-rays (and γ -rays, from IC scatterings of the electrons which emit X-rays as synchrotron emission) show flux variability on a timescale of 0.5 days (Fidelis & Iakubovskyi 2008;Gaidos et al 1996), then the optical fluxes should vary on a timescale of 15 days which is well compatible with the observed timescales in the optical and X-ray/TeV bands (Section 3.4). However, as discussed in Section 3.4, the optical light curve does not seem to be a delayed and stretched version of the X-ray light curve or the TeV γ -ray light curve, implying that the dominant fraction of the observed optical emission does not originate from the X-ray/TeV emission region.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Although the index a is not independent of the curvature parameter b, the conclusion can be reached that an increased flux is accompanied by a hardening of the spectrum (parameter a) since there is only a moderate correlation between the flux and b. This finding is compatible with earlier findings (Fidelis & Iakubovskyi 2008). The (anti)correlation between a and the flux is significant: the non-directional chance probability of the derived correlation coefficient for the nullhypothesis is p < 10 −4 for the RXTE/PCA data, as well as for the Swift/XRT data.…”
Section: Temporal and Spectralsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The Lorentz factors of the X-ray emitting electrons should thus be 1.5 order of magnitudes (factor ∼30) larger than the Lorentz factors of the optically emitting electrons. If the X-rays (and γ-rays, from inverse Compton scatterings of the electrons which emit X-rays as synchrotron emission) show flux variability on a time scale of ≤ 0.5 d (Fidelis & Iakubovskyi 2008;Gaidos et al 1996), then the optical fluxes should vary on a time scale of ≤ 15 d which is well compatible with the observed time scales in the optical and X-ray/TeV bands (Sec. 3.4).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%