2004
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20035687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The XMM-NEWTONΩproject

Abstract: Abstract. We describe XMM-Newton Guaranteed Time observations of a sample of eight high redshift (0.45 < z < 0.62) clusters. The goal of these observations was to measure the luminosity and the temperature of the clusters to a precision of ∼10%, leading to constraints on the possible evolution of the luminosity-temperature (L x − T x ) relation, and ultimately on the values of the matter density, Ω M , and, to a lesser extent, the cosmological constant Ω Λ . The clusters were drawn from the SHARC and 160 Squar… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
69
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
11
69
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The conversion between band and bolometric luminosity is computed using the MEKAL plasma code and measured temperature. Compared with high-redshift measurements (e.g., Ota et al 2006), the slopes match within the uncertainty, while our normalization is smaller, which is in general agreement with the positive redshift evolution of luminosity that has been suggested by previous works (Vikhlinin et al 2002;Lumb et al 2004;Kotov & Vikhlinin 2005). T (keV) Figure 5.…”
Section: The L-t Relationsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The conversion between band and bolometric luminosity is computed using the MEKAL plasma code and measured temperature. Compared with high-redshift measurements (e.g., Ota et al 2006), the slopes match within the uncertainty, while our normalization is smaller, which is in general agreement with the positive redshift evolution of luminosity that has been suggested by previous works (Vikhlinin et al 2002;Lumb et al 2004;Kotov & Vikhlinin 2005). T (keV) Figure 5.…”
Section: The L-t Relationsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Earlier works find α = 1.5 ± 0.3 in Vikhlinin et al (2002) and Lumb et al (2004), and α = 1.8 ± 0.3 in Kotov & Vikhlinin (2005). Maughan et al (2006) find a value of α = 1.3 ± 0.2 when they combine their WARPS cluster sample with that of Vikhlinin et al (2002) and a value of α = 0.8 ± 0.4 for the WARPS sample alone.…”
Section: Vikhlinin Et Al (2009) Quote a Results For The Evolution Of Thementioning
confidence: 85%
“…Thanks to the increasing statistics of distant clusters observed in the last years with Chandra and XMM-Newton, a number of authors analysed this evolution out to the highest redshifts, z 1.3, where clusters have been detected so far. These analyses generally indicate that the amplitude of the L X -T relation has a positive evolution out to z 0.5-0.6 (e.g., Arnaud et al 2002;Lumb et al 2004;Kotov and Vikhlinin 2005), with hints for a possible inversion of this trend at higher redshift (e.g., Ettori et al 2004b;Maughan et al 2006;Branchesi et al 2007). In the attempt of interpreting these results, Voit (2005) showed that radiative cooling, combined with a modest amount of pre-heating with extra entropy, predicts an evolution of the L X -T relation slower than that of the self-similar model, also with an inversion of the trend at high redshift.…”
Section: The Luminosity-temperature Relationmentioning
confidence: 97%