2018
DOI: 10.1109/tit.2017.2719581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Zero-Error Feedback Capacity of State-Dependent Channels

Abstract: The zero-error feedback capacity of the Gelfand-Pinsker channel is established. It can be positive even if the channel's zero-error capacity is zero in the absence of feedback. Moreover, the error-free transmission of a single bit may require more than one channel use. These phenomena do not occur when the state is revealed to the transmitter causally, a case that is solved here using Shannon strategies. Cost constraints on the channel inputs or channel states are also discussed, as is the scenario where-in ad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we show that this upper bound is, in fact, achievable. 1 Unlike [4], [5], we do not assume that channel state information is available at the encoder or decoder. Examples, including a Gilbert-Elliott channel, are considered for which the explicit value of C 0f is computed.…”
Section: A Our Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Here we show that this upper bound is, in fact, achievable. 1 Unlike [4], [5], we do not assume that channel state information is available at the encoder or decoder. Examples, including a Gilbert-Elliott channel, are considered for which the explicit value of C 0f is computed.…”
Section: A Our Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uniform zero-error feedback code is more restrictive than well-known zero-error feedback code used in literature where the transmission always starts at time 1, i.e., t 0 = 0; see, e.g., [4], [5], [41]. However, this only implies that the encoding strategy does not change over time, and this condition is imposed to be able to use the zero-error feedback code starting from any time t 0 + 1 ∈ N. This gives the code a uniform (or time-invariance) property, and yet the code must be able to convey the messages without error for the corresponding block.…”
Section: Definition 3 (Causal Channel)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We refer the reader to [9] for a review of this area. The work most closely related to what we discuss here is that of Bracher-Lapidoth [2], where the zero-error feedback capacity of state-dependent channels was determined, under the assumptions that fixed-length encoding is being used and that state information is available only at the encoder. We also mention the works of Zhao-Permuter [18], where the authors gave a characterization of the zero-error feedback capacity under fixed-length encoding for channels with state information at both the encoder and the decoder (but in which the state process is not necessarily memoryless and is even allowed to depend on the channel inputs), and Tallini-Al-Bassam-Bose [16], where zero-error VLF communication over the binary Z-channel was studied.…”
Section: Zero-error Capacity: Variable-length Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that, unlike for DMCs[14], the conditions for positivity of the zero-error capacity under fixed-length coding for SD-DMCs are in general not the same in the presence or absence of feedback. E.g., there exist channels with C nc,-0,f,FL > C nc,-0,-,FL = 0; see[2, Thm 7]. Hence, the situation is more subtle when channels have states, and not all results are straightforward generalizations of their DMC counterparts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%