1983
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2541(83)80026-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The zeta age calibration of fission-track dating

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
776
0
14

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,046 publications
(790 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
776
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…The magnification used was 1250x for apatite and 1600x (oil) for zircon. All ages were determined using the zeta approach [Hurford and Green, 1983] with a zeta value of 341 ± 6 for CN5/apatite, and of 130 ± 0.6 for CN1/zircon.…”
Section: Appendix A: Fission Track Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnification used was 1250x for apatite and 1600x (oil) for zircon. All ages were determined using the zeta approach [Hurford and Green, 1983] with a zeta value of 341 ± 6 for CN5/apatite, and of 130 ± 0.6 for CN1/zircon.…”
Section: Appendix A: Fission Track Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard and induced track densities were measured on mica external detectors (geometry factor = 0.5), and fossil track densities were measured on internal mineral surfaces. Ages were calculated using the standard fission track age equation [e.g., Hurford and Green, 1983] …”
Section: Fisher Creekmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is good evidence that F apatites anneal more readily than CI apatites Green, 1982Green, , 1983. Four topographic profiles were sampled perpendicular to the strike of the orogen (Figures 4 and 6 Miocene FT history of the various samples (volcanic tuff versus clastic sediments of various stratigraphic ages), or an anomalous but poorly constrained FT age (profile C-C').…”
Section: Erosion Of Critical Wedgesmentioning
confidence: 99%