2015
DOI: 10.15390/eb.2015.4070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thematic Content Analysis of Scale Development Studies Published in the Field of Science and Mathematics Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
11

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
13
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…When the research findings related to the validity analyzes of the scale development studies conducted in the field of educational sciences are examined (Gul & Sozbilir, 2015;Kucuk, Yilmaz, Baydas & Goktas, 2014), it was seen that the scope and appearance validity is one of the most preferred validity types due to the nature of the scale development studies. While many studies (Dalgic, 2008;Kurnaz & Yigit, 2010;Yilmaz & Aydin, 2017) have included findings and information regarding the content validity of the literature, it has been seen that this information is often explained in a short way and no clear information can be found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When the research findings related to the validity analyzes of the scale development studies conducted in the field of educational sciences are examined (Gul & Sozbilir, 2015;Kucuk, Yilmaz, Baydas & Goktas, 2014), it was seen that the scope and appearance validity is one of the most preferred validity types due to the nature of the scale development studies. While many studies (Dalgic, 2008;Kurnaz & Yigit, 2010;Yilmaz & Aydin, 2017) have included findings and information regarding the content validity of the literature, it has been seen that this information is often explained in a short way and no clear information can be found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another issue that attracted the attention of the researcher in the literature review was content validity and appearance validity were often thought to serve the same purpose, and in most of the studies, the first stage of scale development was done. While the content validity helps to evaluate the whole structure as a whole, the appearance validity helps the researchers in terms of the fact that the completed structure is measuring the structure that it wants to measure and it seems to serve the purpose (Gul & Sozbilir, 2015). In this context, it is possible to use the content validity from the first stage to the last stage of the study, while the appearance validity should be used as the type of validity that should be made after the scale structure is completed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When compared to meta-analysis and descriptive content analysis, the number of examined researches is rather limited in meta-synthesis studies (Çalık & Sözbilir, 2014). The aim in meta-synthesis is to lay out similarities and differences of studies by utilizing a conceptual analysis (Gül & Sözbilir, 2015). Induction is in the center of everything, while examining social phenomena with qualitative methods, and an inductive approach is a must from the stage of data collection.…”
Section: Research Patternmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perraton (2000) deneysel karşılaştırmalı araştırmalar, söylem analizi ve derinlemesine görüşmeler gibi yeni yöntemler kullanılarak araştırmaların yürütüldüğünü belirtmektedir. Bununla birlikte literatürde uzaktan eğitimin dışında farklı alanlarla ilgili çalışmaların içerik analiziyle incelendiği görülmektedir (Örneğin: Çalık, Ünal, Coştu ve Karataş, 2008;Gül ve Sözbilir, 2015). Ayrıca bazı dergiler içerik analizi ile ilgili özel sayı yayınlamaktadırlar (Bakınız: Eğitim ve Bilim Dergisi, Sayı 178).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified