We compare the performance across different locations of systems employing photovoltaic (PV) panels, flat-plate and evacuated-tube solar-thermal (ST), and hybrid photovoltaic-thermal (PV-T) collectors to fulfil the energy demands (both thermal and electrical) of multi-effect distillation (MED) desalination plants. We consider large- (1700 m3/day), medium- (120 m3/day) and small-scale (3 m3/day) MED plants.
We find a strong dependence of both the capacity and configuration of the solar collectors used on both the cost of sourcing electricity from the grid and the specific collector employed. We find mean grid-electricity fractions range from 47%, for the lowest grid-cost location, to 2.5% for the highest grid-cost location. We find that systems using PV-T and ST collectors meet between 49% and 62% of the hot-water demand at these locations, respectively. We find lifetime costs for the smallest-, medium- and largest-scale plants' energy-generation systems as low as 0.209, 3.35 and 50.8 million USD, respectively, corresponding to specific costs of 6.37, 2.55 and 2.74 USD/m3.
We find that systems using solar collectors, when optimised for the lowest specific cost, result in associated CO2eq emissions equal to, or higher than, those associated with grid-driven reverse osmosis. These results highlight the need to consider the environmental footprint of these systems, not only their cost, to ensure that desalination is in-line with the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goal 6 (SDG6).