2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.reffit.2016.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical analysis of biogas potential prediction from agricultural waste

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
101
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
101
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The production of biogas (∼ 5000 Nm 3 d −1 , CH 4 60-61%) was lower than the theoretical one (estimated using Buswell equation as reported previously 37 ) during the survey but did not vary >5%. The proportion of the PML in the feedstock mixture was incremented from 1.6% to 7.5%, corresponding to a decrease of the C:N ratio in the feedstock mixture from 14.2 to 11.4 ( Fig.…”
Section: Overall Performance Of the Biogas Plantmentioning
confidence: 40%
“…The production of biogas (∼ 5000 Nm 3 d −1 , CH 4 60-61%) was lower than the theoretical one (estimated using Buswell equation as reported previously 37 ) during the survey but did not vary >5%. The proportion of the PML in the feedstock mixture was incremented from 1.6% to 7.5%, corresponding to a decrease of the C:N ratio in the feedstock mixture from 14.2 to 11.4 ( Fig.…”
Section: Overall Performance Of the Biogas Plantmentioning
confidence: 40%
“…These groups may be regarded in the genomics approach as a prospective useful tool for the determination and subsequent manipulation of appropriate species and an additional marker in models for the prediction of potential biogas yields. Achinas and Euverink (2016) or Demirel and Scherer (2008) also suggest that these microorganisms are important marker groups in methanogenesis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical biochemical methane potential of the material, TBMP (mL/g VS), can be estimated using eqs. 1 and 2 [22][23][24][25][26][27][28], where V m =22.4 L/mol represents the molar volume of the gas under standard conditions, (g/mol) the molar mass of biomass (given by eq. 3), and M i (g/mol) the molar mass of element i (C, H, O, N, and S).…”
Section: Theoretical Biochemical Methane Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to eqs. 2 and 3, the values of and TBMP determined depending on tabulated levels of subscripts, i.e., a=36.51, b=64.03, c=32.53, and d=1, were 1037.53 g/mol and 383 mL/g VS. TBMP is an important parameter for providing essential information before developing biogas projects at industrial scale, allowing comparison between different feedstocks [22]. Table 3 BIOGAS VOLUME, METHANE CONTENT IN BIOGAS, AND METHANE VOLUME DEPENDING ON DIGESTION TIME The inhibitory effect produced by the microalgal extract on the production of biomethane is highlighted in figure 3.…”
Section: Kinetic Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%