Theoretical and Experimental Studies of the Tractive Resistance of the Sowing Complex for the NO-TILL Technology

Shepelev, Sergey; Plaksin, A. M.; Troyanovskaya, Irina; Pyataev, M. V.; Кравченко, Е. Н.

doi:10.1007/978-3-031-14125-6_34

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The conditions of nutrition and lighting in agrophytocenoses varied depending on the seed sowing rate [21]. In thickened crops (5 million germinating seeds/ hectare), the weight of 100 absolutely dry plants was the smallest, which is explained by the worst growing conditions.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of cultivation technology on the yield of winter wheat

Syromyatnikov,

Semenenko,

Orekhovskaya

et al. 2023

E3S Web of Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A comprehensive study has been carried out on the influence of technological methods of growing winter wheat on the process of formation of the above-ground mass of plants in the conditions of the forest-steppe of Ukraine. Crop rotation was carried out with two predecessors: black fallow and spring barley at a seeding rate of 3 and 5 million viable seeds/hectare. Evaluation of the intensity of plant development in the initial period of vegetation (measurement of absolutely dry weight of 100 plants 15 and 30 days after the emergence of full seedlings) was recorded in winter wheat plants in black fallow crops. The largest above-ground mass of the plant was formed 30 days after the emergence of full seedlings. A direct correlation was established between the amount of productive moisture in the soil layer of 0-25 cm and the period of emergence of winter wheat seedlings. The highest level of winter wheat yield was obtained for black fallow 3.46 t/ hectare when sown in the second decade of October.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of cultivation technology on the yield of winter wheat

Syromyatnikov,

Semenenko,

Orekhovskaya

et al. 2023

E3S Web of Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, not all used seeders fully meet the agro technical requirements of sowing. The main task of the grain seeder is the uniform distribution of seeds over the coulters [3], the uniformity of the sowing depth [4][5][6], the creation of an optimal density of the soil layer between the seeds, the control of reliable seeding of seeds and its automation [7][8][9].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Selecting the best planter option based on Harrington function

Tsybulevsky,

Tarasenko,

Troyanovskaya

et al. 2023

BIO Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The assessment of modern grain seeders was carried out according to five indicators: price of the seeder, metal consumption and energy intensity of sowing, specific productivity and technical level of the seeder. Weight coefficients were introduced for each indicator. A method for making an objective decision for choosing the best seeder option from alternative options based on the Harrington function is substantiated. The desirability function has been modernized into a graphical form using rating scales. Any intermediate value of the estimated indicator was projected onto a segment of a straight line connecting the points of intersection of the lines of the minimum and maximum values of the estimated indicators and the extreme lines of the same indicators, projected from the Harrington desirability function to a dimensionless scale. Dependences of the indicators of the desirability function for all evaluated indicators are determined. A generalized indicator of a comprehensive assessment is formulated for making a final decision. As a result, it was found that the ALFA-6 seeder has the best performance. Seeders SZT-3.6 and SZP-3 received the worst rating. Their overall score is 42.9% lower than the ALFA-6 planter. The developed assessment methodology made it possible to outline ways for further improvement.

show abstract